Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

被引:48
|
作者
Gibbons, Philip [1 ]
Macintosh, Andrew [2 ]
Constable, Amy Louise [2 ]
Hayashi, Kiichiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Nagoya Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Int Programs Off, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
averted loss; avoided loss; biodiversity offsets; deforestation; land clearing; restoration; NO-NET-LOSS; WETLAND MITIGATION; ET-AL; POLICY; CONSERVATION; COVER; TIME; DEFORESTATION; LANDSCAPE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13977
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We quantified net changes to the area and quality of native vegetation after the introduction of biodiversity offsetting in New South Wales, Australiaa policy intended to "prevent broad-scale clearing of native vegetation unless it improves or maintains environmental values." Over 10 years, a total of 21,928 ha of native vegetation was approved for clearing under this policy and 83,459 ha was established as biodiversity offsets. We estimated that no net loss in the area of native vegetation under this policy will not occur for 146 years. This is because 82% of the total area offset was obtained by averting losses to existing native vegetation and the rate that these averted losses accrue was over-estimated in the policy. There were predicted net gains in 10 of the 14 attributes used to assess the quality of habitat. An overall net gain in the quality of habitat was assessed under this policy by substituting habitat attributes that are difficult to restore (e.g. mature trees) with habitat attributes for which restoration is relatively easy (e.g. tree seedlings). Long-term rates of annual deforestation did not significantly change across the study area after biodiversity offsetting was introduced. Overall, the policy examined here provides no net loss of biodiversity: (i) many generations into the future, which is not consistent with intergenerational equity; and (ii) by substituting different habitat attributes, so gains are not equivalent to losses. We recommend a number of changes to biodiversity offsetting policy to overcome these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:E643 / E654
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simple analysis of biodiversity response functions and multipliers for biodiversity offsetting and other applications
    Moilanen, Atte
    Lehtinen, Pauli
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2025, 185
  • [32] Biodiversity Offsetting and the Production of 'Equivalent Natures': A Marxist Critique
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Greco, Elisa
    Adams, William M.
    ACME-AN INTERNATIONAL E-JOURNAL FOR CRITICAL GEOGRAPHIES, 2018, 17 (03): : 861 - 892
  • [33] Exploring the practical implementation of marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
    Niner, Holly J.
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Milligan, Ben
    Styan, Craig
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 295
  • [34] The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales
    Florence L. P. Damiens
    Libby Porter
    Ascelin Gordon
    Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4 : 170 - 179
  • [35] Application and attitudes: active restoration in the context of biodiversity offsetting
    Hernandez, Stephanie
    Dorrough, Josh
    Ruoso, Laure-Elise
    Brazill-Boast, James
    Newman, Kate
    Oliver, Ian
    Plant, Roel
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [37] Bibliometric Review of Biodiversity Offsetting During 1992–2019
    Shuling Yu
    Baoshan Cui
    Chengjie Xie
    Ying Man
    Jing Fu
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32 : 189 - 203
  • [38] Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting
    Maron, Martine
    Ives, Christopher D.
    Kujala, Heini
    Bull, Joseph W.
    Maseyk, Fleur J. F.
    Bekessy, Sarah
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Watson, James E. M.
    Lentini, Pia E.
    Gibbons, Philip
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Hobbs, Richard J.
    Keith, David A.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Evans, Megan C.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2016, 66 (06) : 489 - 498
  • [39] Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting: An analysis of rights and responsibilities
    Primmer, Eeva
    Varumo, Liisa
    Kotilainen, Juha M.
    Raitanen, Elina
    Kattainen, Matti
    Pekkonen, Minna
    Kuusela, Saija
    Kullberg, Peter
    Kangas, Johanna A. M.
    Ollikainen, Markku
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 776 - 784
  • [40] The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales
    Damiens, Florence L. P.
    Porter, Libby
    Gordon, Ascelin
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (02) : 170 - 179