Simple analysis of biodiversity response functions and multipliers for biodiversity offsetting and other applications

被引:0
|
作者
Moilanen, Atte [1 ,2 ]
Lehtinen, Pauli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum, POB 17, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Biodiversity credits; Biodiversity offsetting; Compensation ratio; Ecological compensation; Multiplier; Net positive impact; Offset ratio; Software application; NO NET LOSS; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY; OUTCOMES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106322
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Biodiversity offsets mean compensation for ecological losses caused by construction, development, land use or other human activities. They are commonly implemented via protection, restoration, or maintenance of habitats. The goal of offsetting is usually no net loss (NNL), which means that all net losses to biodiversity are fully compensated by commensurate net gains achieved via said offset actions. Here we collate and develop simple calculations for the determination of offset size (area) in the context of so-called multiplier approaches to offsets. We focus on the analysis of the response of habitat condition to action, which is a critical component of multiplier calculations, because the effectiveness and speed of different conservation actions and interventions can vary significantly. An excel application and R-code are included that implement calculations on offset response functions. The proposed methods are also relevant for other applications, including the generation of biodiversity credits for biodiversity credit markets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Cost shifting and other perverse incentives in biodiversity offsetting in India
    Narain, Divya
    Maron, Martine
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (04) : 782 - 788
  • [3] Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting: An analysis of rights and responsibilities
    Primmer, Eeva
    Varumo, Liisa
    Kotilainen, Juha M.
    Raitanen, Elina
    Kattainen, Matti
    Pekkonen, Minna
    Kuusela, Saija
    Kullberg, Peter
    Kangas, Johanna A. M.
    Ollikainen, Markku
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 776 - 784
  • [4] Marine biodiversity offsetting: An analysis of the emergence of an environmental governance system in California
    Jacob, Celine
    Thorin, Sebastien
    Pioch, Sylvain
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 93 : 128 - 141
  • [5] Metabolomics: Applications in functional Biodiversity analysis in potato
    Davies, H. V.
    Proceedings of the VIth International Solanaceae Conference, Solanaceae VI: Genomics Meets Biodiversity, 2007, (745): : 471 - 483
  • [6] Plant functional traits and biodiversity can reveal the response of ecosystem functions to grazing
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhang, Jinghui
    Tang, Yiwei
    Li, Zhiyong
    Liu, Huamin
    Wang, Lixin
    Wu, Yantao
    Liang, Cunzhu
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 899
  • [8] New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis
    Graham, CH
    Ferrier, S
    Huettman, F
    Moritz, C
    Peterson, AT
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2004, 19 (09) : 497 - 503
  • [9] Landscape response functions for biodiversity - assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level
    Zebisch, M
    Wechsung, F
    Kenneweg, H
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 67 (1-4) : 157 - 172
  • [10] Where is France in terms of biodiversity offsetting? Answers based on the analysis of the biodiversity offset measures implemented as part of the South Europe Atlantic High Speed Railway and put into perspective with French mitigation banks and territorial initiatives
    Latune, Julie
    Levrel, Harold
    Frascaria-Lacoste, Nathalie
    CYBERGEO-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2019,