Aerodynamic shape optimization of a transonic fan by an adjoint-response surface method

被引:47
|
作者
Tang, Xiao [1 ]
Luo, Jiaqi [1 ]
Liu, Feng [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aerodynamic design optimization; Adjoint method; Response surface; Compressor rotor; Transonic; FLOW; ROTOR; DESIGN; SWEEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.005
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
An adjoint-response surface method is developed to provide efficient surrogate model in a parametrized design space for aerodynamic optimization of turbomachinery blades. Our goal is to improve the adiabatic efficiency or equivalently reduce the entropy generation through blade row with a mass flow rate constraint. Firstly, an aerodynamic sensitivity analysis is conducted with a viscous adjoint method to find the suitable number of control points on the suction surface of the transonic NASA rotor 67. Then quadratic polynomial (QP) based response surfaces of 4, 6 and 8 parameters are examined to validate the advantages of the gradient-enhanced model. In the following 24-parameter aerodynamic design optimization case, a steepest descent optimization (SDO) based on adjoint gradient is, conducted, then QP based response surface model is constructed using both the values of cost function and its adjoint gradients with respect to geometry control parameters. We present the geometric features, overall aerodynamic improvements and flow details of optimal designs given by SDO and gradient-enhanced response surface model (GERSM). The effects of blade reshaping on shock system, tip clearance flow and flow separation at hub are examined. Also, off-design performances are analyzed regarding both adiabatic efficiency and stall margin. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 36
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Hybrid Bayesian-Adjoint Framework for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Perlini, Alberto
    Abergo, Luca
    Gori, Giulio
    AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024,
  • [42] Reduction of the adjoint gradient formula for aerodynamic shape optimization problems
    Jameson, A., 1600, American Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (41):
  • [43] A dynamically deflated GMRES adjoint solver for aerodynamic shape optimization
    Chen, Chih-Hao
    Nadarajah, Siva
    Castonguay, Patrice
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2019, 179 : 490 - 507
  • [44] Reduction of the adjoint gradient formula for aerodynamic shape optimization problems
    Jameson, A
    Kim, S
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2003, 41 (11) : 2114 - 2129
  • [45] Adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimization on unstructured meshes
    Carpentieri, G.
    Koren, B.
    van Tooren, M. J. L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 224 (01) : 267 - 287
  • [46] OPTIMIZATION OF A TWO-STAGE TRANSONIC AXIAL FAN TO ENHANCE AERODYNAMIC STABILITY
    Ma, Sang-Bum
    Afzal, Arshad
    Kim, Kwang-Yong
    Choi, Jaeho
    Lee, Wonsuk
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 2C, 2016,
  • [47] Numerical optimization of a stator blade to enhance aerodynamic performance in a transonic fan stage
    Park, Kun Sung
    Zamiri, Ali
    Choi, Minsuk
    Lee, Byung Ju
    Chung, Jin Taek
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2024, 103 : 163 - 181
  • [48] Adjoint-based unsteady shape optimization to suppress transonic buffet
    Chen, Wengang
    Gao, Chuanqiang
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Gong, Yiming
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 127
  • [49] Axisymmetric hub-endwall profile optimization for a transonic fan to improve aerodynamic performance based on an integrated design optimization method
    Yan, Cheng
    Yin, Zeyong
    Shen, Xiuli
    Guo, Fushui
    Wu, Yu
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 60 (03) : 1267 - 1282
  • [50] Adjoint⁃based aerodynamic design optimization of transonic turbine cascades considering different constraints
    Li J.
    Luo J.
    Cao Z.
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36 (09): : 1986 - 1998