Adjoint⁃based aerodynamic design optimization of transonic turbine cascades considering different constraints

被引：0
|
作者：
Li J. [1 ]
Luo J. [1 ]
Cao Z. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[2] School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源：
Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power | 2021年 / 36卷 / 09期
关键词：
Adjoint method; Aerodynamic design optimization; Boundary condition; Constraint; Turbine cascade;
D O I：
10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20200468
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A simplified method based on non⁃reflecting boundary theory for determining the inlet and outlet boundary conditions of adjoint equations was introduced, by which the aerodynamic design optimization of turbomachinery blade considering different constraints was investigated.The results showed that the simplified adjoint equations strongly coupling with flow under inlet and outlet boundary conditions were sufficiently accurate and applicable in different constrained optimization design.After outlet specific entropy design optimization without constraints, the outlet specific entropy decreased by 0.253%, with varied passage area and outlet flow angle.Considering the constraints of outlet flow angle and passage area separately and the constraints from both of them, the outlet specific entropy after optimization decreased by 0.176%, 0.227% and 0.164%, respectively.The aerodynamic performance of the optimized blades was significantly improved, while the optimization constraints were maintained.Moreover, the results demonstrated that changing the curvature of blade profile weakened the shock wave effectively.When the curvature of front portions decreased, the flow velocity decelerated and the outlet flow angle increased, meanwhile when the curvature of front portions changed slightly, the outlet flow angle was constrained better. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1986 / 1998
页数：12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] CHUNG H S, ALONSO J J A., Multidisciplinary design optimization of supersonic business jets using approximation model⁃based genetic algorithms, (2004)
  • [2] ZHU Z, WANG X, FU H, Et al., Aerodynamic optimization design of airfoil and wing, AIAA 2004⁃4367, (2004)
  • [3] SAMAD A, KIM K Y., Multiple surrogate modeling for axial compressor blade shape optimization, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 24, 2, pp. 302-310, (2008)
  • [4] BONAIUTI D, ZANGENEH M., On the coupling of inverse design and optimization techniques for the multiobjective, multipoint design of turbomachinery, Journal of Turbomachinery, 131, 2, (2009)
  • [5] LAROCCA F., Multiple objective optimization and inverse design of axial turbomachinery blades, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 24, 5, pp. 1093-1099, (2008)
  • [6] OZHAN O, IBRAHIM S A., Multi⁃objective aerodynamic optimization of axial turbine blades using a novel multilevel genetic algorithm, Journal of Turbomachinery, 132, 4, (2010)
  • [7] JAMESON A., Aerodynamic design via control theory, Journal of Scientific Computing, 3, 3, pp. 233-260, (1988)
  • [8] NADARAJAH S K, JAMESON A., Optimum shape design for unsteady there⁃dimensional viscous flows using a non⁃linear frequency domain method, AIAA 2006⁃3455, (2006)
  • [9] NADARAJAH S K, JAMESON A., Optimum shape design of helicopter rotors in forward flight via control theory, (2007)
  • [10] NADARAJAH S K, JAMESON A., Optimum shape design for unsteady flows with time⁃accurate continuous and discrete adjoint methods, AIAA Journal, 45, 7, pp. 1478-1500, (2007)
123