Study of Surface Morphology, Elemental Composition and Origin of Atmospheric Aerosols (PM2.5 and PM10) over Agra, India

被引:96
|
作者
Pipal, Atar Singh [1 ]
Jan, Rohi [1 ]
Satsangi, P. G. [1 ]
Tiwari, Suresh [2 ]
Taneja, Ajay [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pune, Dept Chem, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, New Delhi 110060, India
[3] Dr BR Ambedkar Univ, Dept Chem, Agra 282002, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Mass and number concentration of PM; Physicochemical properties; Carbon analysis; Seasonal variation; Source identification; FINE ORGANIC AEROSOL; RIVER DELTA REGION; MIXING STATE; AMBIENT AIR; CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL; PARTICULATE MATTER; AIRBORNE PARTICLES; URBAN-ENVIRONMENT; CITY; SOOT;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2014.01.0017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In situ measurements of PM (PM2.5 and PM10) particles were carried out using a medium volume air sampler (offline) and particle number concentrations of PM were measured by a Grimm aerosol spectrophotometer (online) during the study period of 2010-2011. The morphology and elemental composition analyses of PM were performed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS), respectively. The average mass concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were 97.2 and 242.6 mu g/m(3) at roadside (RD) and 121.2 and 230.5 mu g/m(3) at a semirural (SR) site, respectively. These concentrations were substantially higher than the NAAQS, WHO and USEPA standards. The highest mass and number concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were observed during winter, followed by those during the post-monsoon period and summer, with the lowest in the monsoon period. SEM and EDS analysis of PM indicated the presence of soot, mineral, tarballs, fly ash, aluminosilicates/silica, fluorine, carbon rich, and Cl-Na rich particles. Of these particles, soot, tarballs, and F-C rich particles dominate in PM2.5, whereas mineral, aluminosilicates, and Cl-Na rich particles dominate in PM10. The morphology and elemental composition of the particles varied over the seasons due to atmospheric processing. The highest carbon concentration (56%) was observed in PM2.5 during summer at the RD, while in the monsoon, post-monsoon period and winter the carbon concentration was similar to 9% lower at the RD as compared to the SR. However, the concentration of carbon in PM10 was similar to 38% higher at the RD as compared to SR during both summer and winter. Air mass backward trajectory cluster analysis was performed, and the results indicate that the aerosol loadings over Agra are mainly transported from the Middle East and Arabian Sea during the summer and monsoon period, while during the pre-monsoon period and winter the aerosol loadings came from the northern region, and were due to the burning of biomass and coal, as well as other local activities.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1700
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Major component composition of urban PM10 and PM2.5 in Ireland
    Yin, J
    Allen, AG
    Harrison, RM
    Jennings, SG
    Wright, E
    Fitzpatrick, M
    Healy, T
    Barry, E
    Ceburnis, D
    McCusker, D
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2005, 78 (3-4) : 149 - 165
  • [42] Characteristics and Sources of Carbonaceous Aerosols in PM2.5 during Wintertime in Agra, India
    Pachauri, Tripti
    Satsangi, Aparna
    Singla, Vyoma
    Lakhani, Anita
    Kumari, K. Maharaj
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (03) : 977 - 991
  • [43] Composition of PM2.5 and PM10 Collected at Urban Sites in Brazil
    Souza, Davi Z.
    Vasconcellos, Perola C.
    Lee, Helena
    Aurela, Minna
    Saarnio, Karri
    Teinilae, Kimmo
    Hillamo, Risto
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (01) : 168 - 176
  • [44] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    Williams, R
    Suggs, J
    Rodes, C
    Lawless, P
    Zweidinger, R
    Kwok, R
    Creason, J
    Sheldon, L
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05): : 497 - 505
  • [45] PM10 and PM2.5:: an international perspective
    Sloss, LL
    Smith, IM
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 : 127 - 141
  • [46] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    RON WILLIAMS
    JACK SUGGS
    CHARLES RODES
    PHIL LAWLESS
    ROY ZWEIDINGER
    RICHARD KWOK
    JOHN CREASON
    LINDA SHELDON
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2000, 10 : 497 - 505
  • [47] Retrieving visibility with PM10 and PM2.5
    Center for Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, CAS, Hefei 230031, China
    Guangxue Jishu, 2008, 4 (608-609+612):
  • [48] CESAR:: PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations
    Hoek, G
    de Bruin, YB
    Fletcher, T
    Houthuijs, D
    Jirík, V
    Lolova, D
    Meliefste, K
    Mihalíková, E
    Pastuszka, J
    Sachelarescu, S
    Vaskövi, E
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (04) : S29 - S29
  • [49] Temporal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 concentration over Hyderabad
    Ajay Kumar M.C.
    Vinay Kumar P.
    Venkateswara Rao P.
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2020, 19 (05) : 1871 - 1878
  • [50] PM2.5, PM10 and bronchiolitis severity: A cohort study
    Milani, Gregorio P.
    Cafora, Marco
    Favero, Chiara
    Luganini, Anna
    Carugno, Michele
    Lenzi, Erica
    Pistocchi, Anna
    Pinatel, Eva
    Pariota, Luigi
    Ferrari, Luca
    Bollati, Valentina
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10)