Faculty-Resident "Co-learning": A Longitudinal Exploration of an Innovative Model for Faculty Development in Quality Improvement

被引:40
|
作者
Wong, Brian M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goldman, Joanne [1 ,2 ]
Goguen, Jeannette M. [4 ,5 ]
Base, Christian [6 ]
Rotteau, Leahora [2 ,7 ]
Van Melle, Elaine [8 ]
Kuper, Ayelet [1 ,3 ,9 ]
Shojania, Kaveh G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Internal Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Colearning Qual Improvement Curriculum, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Wilson Ctr Res Educ, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
GRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE QUALITY; ACCREDITATION SYSTEM; UNMET NEED; PROGRAM; ETHNOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000001505
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To examine the effectiveness of co-learning, wherein faculty and trainees learn together, as a novel approach for building quality improvement (QI) faculty capacity. Method From July 2012 through September 2015, the authors conducted 30 semistructured interviews with 23 faculty participants from the Co-Learning QI Curriculum of the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and collected descriptive data on faculty participation and resident evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Interviewees were from 13 subspecialty residency programs at their institution. Results Of the 56 faculty participants, the Co-Learning QI Curriculum trained 29 faculty mentors, 14 of whom taught formally. Faculty leads with an academic QI role, many of whom had prior QI training, reinforced their QI knowledge while also developing QI mentorship and teaching skills. Co-learning elements that contributed to QI teaching skills development included seeing first how the QI content is taught, learning through project mentorship, building experience longitudinally over time, a graded transition toward independent teaching, and a supportive program lead. Faculty with limited QI experience reported improved QI knowledge, skills, and project facilitation but were ambivalent about assuming a teacher role. Unplanned outcomes for both groups included QI teaching outside of the curriculum, applying QI principles to other work, networking, and strengthening one's QI professional role. Conclusions The Co-Learning QI Curriculum was effective in improving faculty QI knowledge and skills and increased faculty capacity to teach and mentor QI. Findings suggest that a combination of curriculum and contextual factors were critical to realizing the curriculum's full potential.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utilizing Quality Improvement Methodology to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Between Faculty and Resident Physicians
    Tang, Kevin
    Layne, Sabrina
    Panchal, Sarju
    Mehta, Shivan
    Rhodes, Corinne
    Patel, Neha
    Bird, Amber
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [32] A critical Exploration of Theoretical Frameworks for Reflective Learning: Reflections from a Faculty Development Workshop
    Sow, Chew-Fei
    Rasiah, Supathiratheavy
    Meng Er, Hui Meng
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2025, 35 (01) : 503 - 507
  • [33] Improvement of e-learning education quality in the conditions of the Faculty of Education of the University of Presov
    Burgerova, Jana
    Adamkovicova, Martina
    7TH DISCO CONFERENCE READER: NEW MEDIA AND EDUCATION, 2012, : 122 - 128
  • [34] Programme Learning Outcomes Assessment and Continuous Quality Improvement in Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing, UTHM
    Taib, H.
    Salleh, S. M.
    Zain, B. A. Md
    Azian, M. A.
    Mahzan, S.
    Hafeez, Z. A.
    Ong, P.
    Ahmad, S.
    Rahman, M. N. A.
    Nasir, N. F.
    Azmi, M. Azham
    Rahman, H. A.
    Ngali, Z.
    COLLOQUIUM OF ADVANCED MECHANICS (CAMS2016), 2017, 165
  • [35] A New Model for OnLine Doctoral Course Development with Faculty Quality Assessment
    Schmidt, Thomas M.
    Shaw, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2008, 4 (03) : 69 - 80
  • [36] Development of engineering education service quality model from faculty perspective
    Lakal, Narendra
    Joshi, Kanchan
    Jain, Karuna
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (13-14) : 1442 - 1453
  • [37] A Faculty Professional Development Model That Improves Student Learning, Encourages Active-Learning Instructional Practices, and Works for Faculty at Multiple Institutions
    Pelletreau, Karen N.
    Knight, Jennifer K.
    Lemons, Paula P.
    McCourt, Jill S.
    Merrill, John E.
    Nehm, Ross H.
    Prevost, Luanna B.
    Urban-Lurain, Mark
    Smith, Michelle K.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 17 (02):
  • [38] How do you get to the improvement of teaching? A longitudinal faculty development program for medical educators
    Elliot, DL
    Skeff, KM
    Stratos, GA
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1999, 11 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [39] Interprofessional learning in primary care: An exploration of the service user experience leads to a new model for co-learning
    Worswick, Louise
    Little, Christine
    Ryan, Kath
    Carr, Eloise
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (01) : 283 - 287
  • [40] Distance Learning Model as a Function of the Management Development on Faculty of Maritime Studies
    Mitrovic, Frane
    NASE MORE, 2009, 56 (1-2): : 42 - 48