Faculty-Resident "Co-learning": A Longitudinal Exploration of an Innovative Model for Faculty Development in Quality Improvement

被引:40
|
作者
Wong, Brian M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goldman, Joanne [1 ,2 ]
Goguen, Jeannette M. [4 ,5 ]
Base, Christian [6 ]
Rotteau, Leahora [2 ,7 ]
Van Melle, Elaine [8 ]
Kuper, Ayelet [1 ,3 ,9 ]
Shojania, Kaveh G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Internal Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Colearning Qual Improvement Curriculum, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Wilson Ctr Res Educ, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
GRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE QUALITY; ACCREDITATION SYSTEM; UNMET NEED; PROGRAM; ETHNOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000001505
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To examine the effectiveness of co-learning, wherein faculty and trainees learn together, as a novel approach for building quality improvement (QI) faculty capacity. Method From July 2012 through September 2015, the authors conducted 30 semistructured interviews with 23 faculty participants from the Co-Learning QI Curriculum of the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and collected descriptive data on faculty participation and resident evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Interviewees were from 13 subspecialty residency programs at their institution. Results Of the 56 faculty participants, the Co-Learning QI Curriculum trained 29 faculty mentors, 14 of whom taught formally. Faculty leads with an academic QI role, many of whom had prior QI training, reinforced their QI knowledge while also developing QI mentorship and teaching skills. Co-learning elements that contributed to QI teaching skills development included seeing first how the QI content is taught, learning through project mentorship, building experience longitudinally over time, a graded transition toward independent teaching, and a supportive program lead. Faculty with limited QI experience reported improved QI knowledge, skills, and project facilitation but were ambivalent about assuming a teacher role. Unplanned outcomes for both groups included QI teaching outside of the curriculum, applying QI principles to other work, networking, and strengthening one's QI professional role. Conclusions The Co-Learning QI Curriculum was effective in improving faculty QI knowledge and skills and increased faculty capacity to teach and mentor QI. Findings suggest that a combination of curriculum and contextual factors were critical to realizing the curriculum's full potential.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of rater training on the quality improvement cycle of a faculty development programme
    van de Ridder, J. M. Monica
    Arora, Bhawana
    Abbas, Shan
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 54 (05) : 480 - 480
  • [22] INVOLVING ATTENDING FACULTY IN RESIDENT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CURRICULUM TO ACHIEVE ABIM MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION CREDIT
    Oyler, Julie L.
    Vinci, Lisa M.
    Arora, Vineet
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 : S470 - S470
  • [23] Changing the foundations of faculty development by developing a quality learning environment
    Hughes, Jeremy A.
    Ofstad, William
    Fuentes, David G.
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2022, 14 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [24] Better together: Faculty development for quality improvement in the nurse educator role
    Monsivais, Diane B.
    Robbins, Leslie K.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2020, 15 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [25] What's in It for Me? Maintenance of Certification as an Incentive for Faculty Supervision of Resident Quality Improvement Projects
    Rosenbluth, Glenn
    Tabas, Jeffrey A.
    Baron, Robert B.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2016, 91 (01) : 56 - 59
  • [26] Action research into the quality of student learning - A paradigm for faculty development
    Kember, D
    McKay, J
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 67 (05): : 528 - +
  • [27] Faculty perceptions of a town hall model for engagement in continuous quality improvement
    Meny, Lisa M.
    Seiferlein, Mandy R.
    Chen, Aleda M. H.
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2021, 13 (08) : 968 - 974
  • [28] Continuous quality improvement and community-based faculty development through an innovative site visit program at one institution
    Malik, Rebecca
    Bordman, Risa
    Regehr, Glenn
    Freeman, Risa
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (05) : 465 - 468
  • [29] Enhancing Quality Improvement Learning for Fellows by Improving Faculty Knowledge and Mentorship Skills
    Cummings, K.
    Shah, B.
    Fernandez, H.
    Chang, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 : S73 - S73
  • [30] Development of a respiratory quality improvement faculty in an acute hospital using QI methodology
    Boast, Lucy Anne
    Hampson, Judith Anne
    Saville, Rachel Louise
    Toplis, Emma
    Baguneid, Abdulla
    Williams, Daniel Alexander
    Choudhury, Aklak
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (04)