The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review

被引:251
|
作者
Bruce, Angela J.
Ritchie, Craig W.
Blizard, Robert
Lai, Rosalind
Raven, Peter
机构
[1] Waitemata Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll, Sch Med, Dept Mental Hlth Sci, London, England
[3] UCL Royal Free Hosp, London NW3 2QG, England
[4] Islington Mental Hlth & Social Care Trust, London, England
关键词
delirium; incidence; orthopedic surgery; meta-analysis; review;
D O I
10.1017/S104161020600425X
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and metaanalysis of the literature regarding the incidence of delirium following orthopedic surgery. Methods: Relevant papers were sourced from online databases and gray literature. Included studies used a validated diagnostic method to measure the incidence of delirium in a prospective sample of adult/elderly orthopedic patients. Data were subject to meta-analysis after stratification by type of surgery (elective v. emergency) and inclusion/exclusion of pre-existing cognitive impairment. A funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Results: 26 publications reported an incidence of postoperative delirium of 453.3% in hip fracture samples and 3.6-28.3% in elective samples. Significant heterogeneity was evident, and this persisted despite stratification. Hip fracture was associated with a higher risk of delirium than elective surgery both when the cognitively impaired were included in the sample (random effects pooled estimate =21.7% [95% CI = 14.6-28.8] vs. 12.1% [95% Cl = 9.6-14.6]), and when the cognitively impaired were excluded (random effects pooled estimate = 25% [95% CI = 15.7-34.7] vs. 8.8% [95% CI = 4.1-13.6]). The funnel plot showed a deficit of small studies showing low risk and large studies showing high risk. In eight hip fracture studies, the proportion of delirium cases with a preoperative onset ranged from 34 to 92%.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 214
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review
    Presson, PK
    Benassi, VA
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1996, 11 (03): : 493 - 510
  • [32] Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review
    Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer
    Markus Blut
    Sarah Hong Xiao
    Dhruv Grewal
    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48 : 384 - 404
  • [33] DEPRESSION AND IMMUNITY - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW
    HERBERT, TB
    COHEN, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 113 (03) : 472 - 486
  • [34] The generation effect: A meta-analytic review
    Bertsch, Sharon
    Pesta, Bryan J.
    Wiscott, Richard
    McDaniel, Mchael A.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2007, 35 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [35] Consumer confusion: A meta-analytic review
    Shahid, Shadma
    Maseeh, Haroon Iqbal
    Jebarajakirthy, Charles
    Sharma, Bhuvanesh Kumar
    Saha, Raiswa
    Gupta, Shubhi
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 192
  • [36] REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN META-ANALYTIC METHOD
    BANGERTDROWNS, RL
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 99 (03) : 388 - 399
  • [37] A review of meta-analytic research in accounting
    Khlif, Hichem
    Chalmers, Keryn
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING LITERATURE, 2015, 35 : 1 - 27
  • [38] Collaborative Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Leib, Margarita
    Koebis, Nils
    Soraperra, Ivan
    Weisel, Ori
    Shalvi, Shaul
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 147 (12) : 1241 - 1268
  • [39] Giving Thanks is Associated with Lower PTSD Severity: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Richardson, Angela L.
    Gallagher, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2021, 22 (06) : 2549 - 2562
  • [40] Are attitudes towards emotions associated with depression? A Conceptual and meta-analytic review
    Yoon, Sunkyung
    Dang, Van
    Mertz, Jessica
    Rottenberg, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 232 : 329 - 340