The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review

被引:251
|
作者
Bruce, Angela J.
Ritchie, Craig W.
Blizard, Robert
Lai, Rosalind
Raven, Peter
机构
[1] Waitemata Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll, Sch Med, Dept Mental Hlth Sci, London, England
[3] UCL Royal Free Hosp, London NW3 2QG, England
[4] Islington Mental Hlth & Social Care Trust, London, England
关键词
delirium; incidence; orthopedic surgery; meta-analysis; review;
D O I
10.1017/S104161020600425X
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and metaanalysis of the literature regarding the incidence of delirium following orthopedic surgery. Methods: Relevant papers were sourced from online databases and gray literature. Included studies used a validated diagnostic method to measure the incidence of delirium in a prospective sample of adult/elderly orthopedic patients. Data were subject to meta-analysis after stratification by type of surgery (elective v. emergency) and inclusion/exclusion of pre-existing cognitive impairment. A funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Results: 26 publications reported an incidence of postoperative delirium of 453.3% in hip fracture samples and 3.6-28.3% in elective samples. Significant heterogeneity was evident, and this persisted despite stratification. Hip fracture was associated with a higher risk of delirium than elective surgery both when the cognitively impaired were included in the sample (random effects pooled estimate =21.7% [95% CI = 14.6-28.8] vs. 12.1% [95% Cl = 9.6-14.6]), and when the cognitively impaired were excluded (random effects pooled estimate = 25% [95% CI = 15.7-34.7] vs. 8.8% [95% CI = 4.1-13.6]). The funnel plot showed a deficit of small studies showing low risk and large studies showing high risk. In eight hip fracture studies, the proportion of delirium cases with a preoperative onset ranged from 34 to 92%.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 214
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Blume, Brian D.
    Ford, J. Kevin
    Baldwin, Timothy T.
    Huang, Jason L.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (04) : 1065 - 1105
  • [22] Framing effect: A meta-analytic review
    Gambara, H
    Pi, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 22 - 22
  • [23] A meta-analytic review of treatment of homosexuality
    Byrd, AD
    Nicolosi, J
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2002, 90 (03) : 1139 - 1152
  • [24] ADHD and personality: A meta-analytic review
    Gomez, Rapson
    Corr, Philip J.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2014, 34 (05) : 376 - 388
  • [25] A Meta-Analytic Review of Paternalistic Leadership
    Bedi, Akanksha
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2020, 69 (03): : 960 - 1008
  • [26] Depressive realism: A meta-analytic review
    Moore, Michael T.
    Fresco, David M.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (06) : 496 - 509
  • [27] Autism and attachment: a meta-analytic review
    Rutgers, AH
    Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ
    van Ijzendoorn, MH
    van Berckelaer-Onnes, IA
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 45 (06) : 1123 - 1134
  • [28] Displaced aggression: A meta-analytic review
    Miller, N
    Marcus-Newhall, A
    Pedersen, WC
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 1999, 25 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [29] A Meta-Analytic Review of Corridor Effectiveness
    Gilbert-Norton, Lynne
    Wilson, Ryan
    Stevens, John R.
    Beard, Karen H.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 660 - 668
  • [30] Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review
    Harms, P. D.
    Crede, Marcus
    Tynan, Michael
    Leon, Matthew
    Jeung, Wonho
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01): : 178 - 194