Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis

被引:412
|
作者
Salonen, Anne [1 ]
Nikkila, Janne [1 ]
Jalanka-Tuovinen, Jonna [1 ]
Immonen, Outi [1 ]
Rajilic-Stojanovic, Mirjana [2 ]
Kekkonen, Riina A. [3 ]
Palva, Airi [1 ]
de Vos, Willem M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Div Microbiol & Epidemiol, Dept Vet Basic Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Wageningen Univ, Microbiol Lab, NL-6703 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Valio Ltd, R&D, FIN-00039 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Intestinal microbiota; DNA extraction; 16S rRNA; Microarray; HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA; GRADIENT GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA; REAL-TIME PCR; GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MICROBIOTA; HUMAN INTESTINAL-TRACT; METHANOBREVIBACTER-SMITHII; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; METAGENOMIC ANALYSIS; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Several different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations >0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n = 24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols: A fast, universal maxi-preparation of high quality plant DNA for genetic evaluation and phylogenetic studies
    Csaikl, UM
    Bastian, H
    Brettschneider, R
    Gauch, S
    Meir, A
    Schauerte, M
    Scholz, F
    Sperisen, C
    Vornam, B
    Ziegenhagen, B
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 1998, 16 (01) : 69 - 86
  • [42] Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns
    Lee, Hwan Young
    Park, Myung Jin
    Kim, Na Young
    Sim, Jeong Eun
    Yang, Woo Ick
    Shin, Kyoung-Jin
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2010, 4 (05) : 275 - 280
  • [43] An efficient and reliable DNA extraction method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comparison of allele drop out and amplification rates using different single cell lysis methods
    Kim, Sung Ah
    Yoon, Jung Ah
    Kang, Moon Joo
    Choi, Young Min
    Chae, Soo Jin
    Moon, Shin Yong
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (02) : 814 - 818
  • [44] Multicenter comparative study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA extraction methods from stool samples, and mechanical pretreatment protocols evaluation
    Nourrisson, Celine
    Moniot, Maxime
    Tressol, Maxime
    Lambert, Celine
    Frealle, Emilie
    Robert-Gangneux, Florence
    Costa, Damien
    Basmaciyan, Louise
    Poirier, Philippe
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [45] Simple broad-spectrum protocol using labiase for bacterial cell lysis to prepare genomic DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis
    Oana, Kozue
    Kawakami, Yoshiyuki
    Hayashi, Tetsuya
    Ohnishi, Makoto
    MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 53 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [46] Comparison of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Extraction Methods for Downstream Analysis in Cancer Patients
    van der Leest, Paul
    Boonstra, Pieter A.
    ter Elst, Arja
    van Kempen, Leon C.
    Tibbesma, Marco
    Koopmans, Jill
    Miedema, Anneke
    Tamminga, Menno
    Groen, Harry J. M.
    Reyners, Anna K. L.
    Schuuring, Ed
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [47] A comparison of different pre-lysis methods and extraction kits for recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Lancefield group B Streptococcus) DNA from whole blood
    Burke, Rachael M.
    McKenna, James P.
    Cox, Ciara
    Coyle, Peter V.
    Shields, Michael D.
    Fairley, Derek J.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 129 : 103 - 108
  • [48] Assessing DNA recovery from highly degraded skeletal remains by using silica-based extraction methods
    Vinueza-Espinosa, Diana C.
    Santos, Cristina
    Martinez-Labarga, Cristina
    Malgosa, Assumpcio
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2019, 7 (01) : 810 - 812
  • [49] Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals
    Prado, M
    Franco, CM
    Fente, CA
    Cepeda, A
    Vázquez, BI
    Barros-Velázquez, J
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2002, 23 (7-8) : 1005 - 1012
  • [50] An efficient and cost-effective method for DNA extraction from athalassohaline soil using a newly formulated cell extraction buffer
    Narayan, Avinash
    Jain, Kunal
    Shah, Amita R.
    Madamwar, Datta
    3 BIOTECH, 2016, 6 : 1 - 7