Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis

被引:412
|
作者
Salonen, Anne [1 ]
Nikkila, Janne [1 ]
Jalanka-Tuovinen, Jonna [1 ]
Immonen, Outi [1 ]
Rajilic-Stojanovic, Mirjana [2 ]
Kekkonen, Riina A. [3 ]
Palva, Airi [1 ]
de Vos, Willem M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Div Microbiol & Epidemiol, Dept Vet Basic Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Wageningen Univ, Microbiol Lab, NL-6703 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Valio Ltd, R&D, FIN-00039 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Intestinal microbiota; DNA extraction; 16S rRNA; Microarray; HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA; GRADIENT GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA; REAL-TIME PCR; GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MICROBIOTA; HUMAN INTESTINAL-TRACT; METHANOBREVIBACTER-SMITHII; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; METAGENOMIC ANALYSIS; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Several different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations >0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n = 24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative study of two extraction methods routinely used for DNA recovery from simulated post coital samples
    Mudariki, T.
    Pallikarana-Tirumala, H.
    Ives, L.
    Hadi, S.
    Goodwin, W.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2013, 4 (01) : E194 - E195
  • [32] Improved resolution of mixed STR profiles using a fully automated differential cell lysis/DNA extraction method
    Goldstein, Matthew C.
    Cox, Jordan O.
    Seman, Lori B.
    Cruz, Tracey Dawson
    FORENSIC SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2020, 5 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [33] Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA Extraction Methods from Small Ruminant Blood and Milk Cells
    Caldart, Eloiza Teles
    Chiappetta, Catarina Marcon
    Lopes, Eliana Franco
    Ravazzolo, Ana Paula
    ACTA SCIENTIAE VETERINARIAE, 2011, 39 (01)
  • [34] Effective DNA extraction method for fragment analysis using capillary sequencer of the kelp, Saccharina
    Takashi Maeda
    Tadashi Kawai
    Masahiro Nakaoka
    Norishige Yotsukura
    Journal of Applied Phycology, 2013, 25 : 337 - 347
  • [35] Effective DNA extraction method for fragment analysis using capillary sequencer of the kelp, Saccharina
    Maeda, Takashi
    Kawai, Tadashi
    Nakaoka, Masahiro
    Yotsukura, Norishige
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (01) : 337 - 347
  • [36] Comparative DNA microarray analysis of host cell transcriptional responses to infection by Coxiella burnetii or Chlamydia trachomatis
    Ren, Q
    Robertson, SJ
    Howe, D
    Barrows, LF
    Heinzen, RA
    RICKETTSIOLOGY: PRESENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS, 2003, 990 : 701 - 713
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of PCR-Based Biomarker Assay Methods for Colorectal Polyp Detection from Fecal DNA
    Ausch, Christoph
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Tsuchiya, Karen D.
    Dzieciatkowski, Slavomir
    Washington, Mary K.
    Paraskeva, Christos
    Radich, Jerry
    Grady, William M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (08) : 1559 - 1563
  • [38] Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling
    Shvartsman, Elinor
    Richmond, Meika E. I.
    Schellenberg, John J.
    Lamont, Alana
    Perciani, Catia
    Russell, Justen N. H.
    Poliquin, Vanessa
    Burgener, Adam
    Jaoko, Walter
    Sandstrom, Paul
    MacDonald, Kelly S.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [39] DNA recovery from a single bacterial cell using charge-reversible magnetic nanoparticles
    Maeda, Yoshiaki
    Toyoda, Takahiro
    Mogi, Takeyuki
    Taguchi, Tomoyuki
    Tanaami, Takeo
    Yoshino, Tomoko
    Matsunaga, Tadashi
    Tanaka, Tsuyoshi
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES, 2016, 139 : 117 - 122
  • [40] Comparative Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Protocols: A Fast, Universal Maxi-Preparation of High Quality Plant DNA for Genetic Evaluation and Phylogenetic Studies
    U.M. Csaikl
    H. Bastian
    R. Brettschneider
    S. Gauch
    A. Meir
    M. Schauerte
    F. Scholz
    C. Sperisen
    B. Vornam
    B. Ziegenhagen
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1998, 16 : 69 - 86