Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis

被引:412
|
作者
Salonen, Anne [1 ]
Nikkila, Janne [1 ]
Jalanka-Tuovinen, Jonna [1 ]
Immonen, Outi [1 ]
Rajilic-Stojanovic, Mirjana [2 ]
Kekkonen, Riina A. [3 ]
Palva, Airi [1 ]
de Vos, Willem M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Div Microbiol & Epidemiol, Dept Vet Basic Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Wageningen Univ, Microbiol Lab, NL-6703 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Valio Ltd, R&D, FIN-00039 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Intestinal microbiota; DNA extraction; 16S rRNA; Microarray; HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA; GRADIENT GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA; REAL-TIME PCR; GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MICROBIOTA; HUMAN INTESTINAL-TRACT; METHANOBREVIBACTER-SMITHII; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; METAGENOMIC ANALYSIS; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Several different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations >0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n = 24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Lysis Methods for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA for Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota
    Gill, Christina
    van de Wijgert, Janneke H. H. M.
    Blow, Frances
    Darby, Alistair C.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [2] Integrated bacterial cell lysis and DNA extraction using paper-based isotachophoresis
    Soni, Shruti
    Toley, Bhushan J.
    LAB ON A CHIP, 2025, 25 (04) : 686 - 697
  • [3] Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using sonication for microarray analysis
    Zhang, LX
    Foxman, B
    Gilsdorf, JR
    Marrs, CF
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2005, 39 (05) : 640 - +
  • [4] Comparison of seven methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal and cecal samples of mice
    Ferrand, Janina
    Patron, Kevin
    Legrand-Frossi, Christine
    Frippiat, Jean-Pol
    Merlin, Christophe
    Alauzet, Corentine
    Lozniewski, Alain
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2014, 105 : 180 - 185
  • [5] Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods in Analysis of Salivary Bacterial Communities
    Lazarevic, Vladimir
    Gaia, Nadia
    Girard, Myriam
    Francois, Patrice
    Schrenzel, Jacques
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [6] The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery
    Fiedorova, Kristyna
    Radvansky, Matej
    Nemcova, Eva
    Grombirikova, Hana
    Bosak, Juraj
    Cernochova, Michaela
    Lexa, Matej
    Smajs, David
    Freiberger, Tomas
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [7] Semi-automated extraction of microbial DNA from feces for qPCR and phylogenetic microarray analysis
    Nylund, Lotta
    Heilig, Hans G. H. J.
    Salminen, Seppo
    de Vos, Willem M.
    Satokari, Reetta
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 83 (02) : 231 - 235
  • [8] Comparative analysis of eight DNA extraction methods for molecular research in mealybugs
    Wang, Yu-Sheng
    Dai, Tian-Mei
    Tian, Hu
    Wan, Fang-Hao
    Zhang, Gui-Fen
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [9] Evaluating the impact of bead media diameter and material composition on bacterial cell lysis and genomic DNA extraction
    Proctor, Caleb
    Soldat, Shelby M.
    Easparro, Brandon
    Nash, Rodney
    Atwood, James
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2019, 33
  • [10] Comparison of Commercial DNA Extraction Kits for Recovery of Bacterial, Protozoan, and Viral Organisms Spiked in Human Fecal Samples
    Brzezinski, S.
    Skipworth, S.
    Grigorenko, E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 933 - 934