Source contributions to PM10 and arsenic concentrations in Central Chile using positive matrix factorization

被引:100
|
作者
Hedberg, E [1 ]
Gidhagen, L
Johansson, C
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Inst Appl Environm Res, S-10692 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
source-receptor modelling; PMF; elemental source profile; smelter emission; particles;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sampling of particles (PM10) was conducted during a one-year period at two rural sites in Central Chile, Quillota and Linares. The samples were analyzed for elemental composition. The data sets have undergone source-recepior analyses in order to estimate the sources and their abundance's in the PM10 size fraction. by using the factor analytical method positive matrix factorization (PMF). The analysis showed that PM10 was dominated by soil resuspension at both sites during the summer months, while during winter traffic dominated the particle mass at Quillota and local wood burning dominated the particle mass at Linares. Two copper smelters impacted the Quillota station, and contributed to 10% and 16% of PM10 as an average during summer and winter. respectively. One smelter impacted Linares by 8% and 19% of PM10 in the summer and winter, respectively. For arsenic the two smelters accounted for 87% of the monitored arsenic levels at Quillota and at Linares one smelter contributed with 72% of the measured mass. In comparison with PMF, the use of a dispersion model tended to overestimate the smelter contribution to arsenic levels at both sites. The robustness of the PMF model was tested by using randomly reduced data sets, where 85%, 70%, 50% and 33% of the samples were included. In this way the ability of the model to reconstruct the sources initially found by the original data set could be tested. On average for all sources the relative standard deviation increased from 7% to 25% for the variables identifying the sources, when decreasing the data set from 85% to 33% of the samples, indicating that the solution initially found was very stable to begin with. But it was also noted that sources due to industrial or combustion processes were more sensitive for the size of the data set, compared to the natural sources as local soil and sea spray sources. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contribution of point and small-scaled sources to the PM10 emission using positive matrix factorization model
    Farahmandkia, Zohre
    Moattar, Faramarz
    Zayeri, Farid
    Sekhavatjou, Mohamad Sadegh
    Mansouri, Nabiollah
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (01)
  • [22] Contribution of point and small-scaled sources to the PM10 emission using positive matrix factorization model
    Zohre Farahmandkia
    Faramarz Moattar
    Farid Zayeri
    Mohamad Sadegh Sekhavatjou
    Nabiollah mansouri
    Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 15
  • [23] Application of positive matrix factorization in characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 emission sources at urban roadside
    Srimuruganandam, B.
    Nagendra, S. M. Shiva
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 88 (01) : 120 - 130
  • [24] Comparison of PM10 Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
    Weber, Samuel
    Salameh, Dalia
    Albinet, Alexandre
    Alleman, Laurent Y.
    Waked, Antoine
    Besombes, Jean-Luc
    Jacob, Veronique
    Guillaud, Geraldine
    Meshbah, Boualem
    Rocq, Benoit
    Hulin, Agnes
    Dominik-Segue, Marta
    Chretien, Eve
    Jaffrezo, Jean-Luc
    Favez, Olivier
    ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (06)
  • [25] Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing using positive matrix factorization
    Xiangchun Jin
    Caijin Xiao
    Jue Li
    Donghui Huang
    Guojun Yuan
    Yonggang Yao
    Xinghua Wang
    Long Hua
    Guiying Zhang
    Lei Cao
    Pingsheng Wang
    Bangfa Ni
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2016, 307 : 2147 - 2154
  • [26] Factors affecting the concentrations of PM10 in central Taiwan
    Kuo, Chung-Yih
    Chen, Po-Tso
    Lin, Yu-Chi
    Lin, Chuan-Yao
    Chen, Hsin-Hong
    Shih, Jeng-Fu
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 70 (07) : 1273 - 1279
  • [27] Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing using positive matrix factorization
    Jin, Xiangchun
    Xiao, Caijin
    Li, Jue
    Huang, Donghui
    Yuan, Guojun
    Yao, Yonggang
    Wang, Xinghua
    Hua, Long
    Zhang, Guiying
    Cao, Lei
    Wang, Pingsheng
    Ni, Bangfa
    JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2016, 307 (03) : 2147 - 2154
  • [28] Source apportionment of ambient particle number concentrations in central Los Angeles using positive matrix factorization (PMF)
    Sowlat, Mohammad Hossein
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Sioutas, Constantinos
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (08) : 4849 - 4866
  • [29] Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in a desert region in northern Chile
    Jorquera, Hector
    Barraza, Francisco
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 444 : 327 - 335
  • [30] Source contributions to PM2.5 and PM10 at an urban background and a street location
    Keuken, M. P.
    Moerman, M.
    Voogt, M.
    Blom, M.
    Weijers, E. P.
    Rockmann, T.
    Dusek, U.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 71 : 26 - 35