Source contributions to PM10 and arsenic concentrations in Central Chile using positive matrix factorization

被引:100
|
作者
Hedberg, E [1 ]
Gidhagen, L
Johansson, C
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Inst Appl Environm Res, S-10692 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
source-receptor modelling; PMF; elemental source profile; smelter emission; particles;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sampling of particles (PM10) was conducted during a one-year period at two rural sites in Central Chile, Quillota and Linares. The samples were analyzed for elemental composition. The data sets have undergone source-recepior analyses in order to estimate the sources and their abundance's in the PM10 size fraction. by using the factor analytical method positive matrix factorization (PMF). The analysis showed that PM10 was dominated by soil resuspension at both sites during the summer months, while during winter traffic dominated the particle mass at Quillota and local wood burning dominated the particle mass at Linares. Two copper smelters impacted the Quillota station, and contributed to 10% and 16% of PM10 as an average during summer and winter. respectively. One smelter impacted Linares by 8% and 19% of PM10 in the summer and winter, respectively. For arsenic the two smelters accounted for 87% of the monitored arsenic levels at Quillota and at Linares one smelter contributed with 72% of the measured mass. In comparison with PMF, the use of a dispersion model tended to overestimate the smelter contribution to arsenic levels at both sites. The robustness of the PMF model was tested by using randomly reduced data sets, where 85%, 70%, 50% and 33% of the samples were included. In this way the ability of the model to reconstruct the sources initially found by the original data set could be tested. On average for all sources the relative standard deviation increased from 7% to 25% for the variables identifying the sources, when decreasing the data set from 85% to 33% of the samples, indicating that the solution initially found was very stable to begin with. But it was also noted that sources due to industrial or combustion processes were more sensitive for the size of the data set, compared to the natural sources as local soil and sea spray sources. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Elemental analysis of PM10 in southwest Mexico City and source apportionment using positive matrix factorization
    Lourdes Verónica Mejía-Ponce
    Alfonso Enrique Hernández-López
    Javier Miranda-Martín-del-Campo
    Juan Carlos Pineda-Santamaría
    Salvador Reynoso-Cruces
    Juan Antonio Mendoza-Flores
    Alberto Antonio Espinosa-Guzmán
    Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2022, 79 : 167 - 198
  • [12] Source Apportionment of PM10 by Positive Matrix Factorization in Urban Area of Mumbai, India
    Gupta, Indrani
    Salunkhe, Abhaysinh
    Kumar, Rakesh
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [13] Identification of the sources of PM10 in a subway tunnel using positive matrix factorization
    Park, Duckshin
    Lee, Taejeong
    Hwang, Doyeon
    Jung, Wonseok
    Lee, Yongil
    Cho, KiChul
    Kim, Dongsool
    Lee, Kiyoung
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (12) : 1361 - 1368
  • [14] Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 using positive matrix factorization and chemical mass balance in Izmir, Turkey
    Yatkin, Sinan
    Bayram, Abdurrahman
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 390 (01) : 109 - 123
  • [15] Anthropogenic and natural levels of arsenic in PM10 in Central and Northern Chile
    Gidhagen, L
    Kahelin, H
    Schmidt-Thomé, P
    Johansson, C
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (23) : 3803 - 3817
  • [16] Assessment of sea salt and mineral dust contributions to PM10 in NW Germany using tracer models and positive matrix factorization
    Beuck, H.
    Quass, U.
    Klemm, O.
    Kuhlbusch, T. A. J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (32) : 5813 - 5821
  • [17] Application of Positive Matrix Factorization Receptor Model for Source Identification of PM10 in the City of Sofia, Bulgaria
    Hristova, Elena
    Veleva, Blagorodka
    Georgieva, Emilia
    Branzov, Hristomir
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (09)
  • [18] Source apportionment by positive matrix factorization on elemental concentration obtained in PM10 and biomonitors collected in the vicinities of a steelworks
    Lage, Joana
    Wolterbeek, Hubert Th.
    Reis, Miguel A.
    Chaves, Paula C.
    Garcia, Silvia
    Almeida, Susana M.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2016, 309 (01) : 397 - 404
  • [19] Source apportionment by positive matrix factorization on elemental concentration obtained in PM10 and biomonitors collected in the vicinities of a steelworks
    Joana Lage
    Hubert Th. Wolterbeek
    Miguel A. Reis
    Paula C. Chaves
    Sílvia Garcia
    Susana M. Almeida
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2016, 309 : 397 - 404
  • [20] Spatial and temporal variations of ambient PM2.5 source contributions using positive matrix factorization
    Wang, Qin
    Zhang, Da-Wei
    Liu, Bao-Xian
    Chen, Tian
    Wei, Qiang
    Li, Jin-Xiang
    Liang, Yun-Ping
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2015, 35 (10): : 2917 - 2924