Source contributions to PM10 and arsenic concentrations in Central Chile using positive matrix factorization

被引:100
|
作者
Hedberg, E [1 ]
Gidhagen, L
Johansson, C
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Inst Appl Environm Res, S-10692 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
source-receptor modelling; PMF; elemental source profile; smelter emission; particles;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sampling of particles (PM10) was conducted during a one-year period at two rural sites in Central Chile, Quillota and Linares. The samples were analyzed for elemental composition. The data sets have undergone source-recepior analyses in order to estimate the sources and their abundance's in the PM10 size fraction. by using the factor analytical method positive matrix factorization (PMF). The analysis showed that PM10 was dominated by soil resuspension at both sites during the summer months, while during winter traffic dominated the particle mass at Quillota and local wood burning dominated the particle mass at Linares. Two copper smelters impacted the Quillota station, and contributed to 10% and 16% of PM10 as an average during summer and winter. respectively. One smelter impacted Linares by 8% and 19% of PM10 in the summer and winter, respectively. For arsenic the two smelters accounted for 87% of the monitored arsenic levels at Quillota and at Linares one smelter contributed with 72% of the measured mass. In comparison with PMF, the use of a dispersion model tended to overestimate the smelter contribution to arsenic levels at both sites. The robustness of the PMF model was tested by using randomly reduced data sets, where 85%, 70%, 50% and 33% of the samples were included. In this way the ability of the model to reconstruct the sources initially found by the original data set could be tested. On average for all sources the relative standard deviation increased from 7% to 25% for the variables identifying the sources, when decreasing the data set from 85% to 33% of the samples, indicating that the solution initially found was very stable to begin with. But it was also noted that sources due to industrial or combustion processes were more sensitive for the size of the data set, compared to the natural sources as local soil and sea spray sources. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatiotemporal variations of ambient PM10 source contributions in Beijing in 2004 using positive matrix factorization
    Xie, S. D.
    Liu, Z.
    Chen, T.
    Hua, L.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (10) : 2701 - 2716
  • [2] PM10 Source Apportionment in Ahvaz, Iran, Using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Sowlat, Mohammad Hossein
    Naddafi, Kazem
    Yunesian, Masud
    Jackson, Peter L.
    Lotfi, Saeedeh
    Shahsavani, Abbas
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2013, 41 (12) : 1143 - 1151
  • [3] Source apportionment of PM10 at a small industrial area using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Lim, Jong-Myoung
    Lee, Jin-Hong
    Moon, Jong-Hwa
    Chung, Yong-Sam
    Kim, Ki-Hyun
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2010, 95 (01) : 88 - 100
  • [4] PM10 metal concentrations and source identification using positive matrix factorization and wind sectoring in a French industrial zone
    Alleman, Laurent Y.
    Lamaison, Laure
    Perdrix, Esperanza
    Robache, Antoine
    Galloo, Jean-Claude
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (04) : 612 - 625
  • [5] Source identification of PM10 pollution in subway passenger cabins using positive matrix factorization
    Park, Duckshin
    Oh, Miseok
    Yoon, Younghun
    Park, Eunyoung
    Lee, Kiyoung
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 49 : 180 - 185
  • [6] Source Apportionment of PM10 at Pyeongtaek Area Using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Model
    Heo, Jongwon
    Kim, Chanhyuk
    Min, Yoonki
    Kim, Hyeonja
    Sung, Yeongook
    Kim, Jongsoo
    Lee, Kyoungbin
    Heo, Jongbae
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 34 (06) : 849 - 864
  • [7] Source apportionment of PM10 by using positive matrix factorization at an urban site of Delhi, India
    Sharma, S. K.
    Mandal, T. K.
    Saxena, Mohit
    Rashmi
    Rohtash
    Sharma, A.
    Gautam, R.
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2014, 10 : 656 - 670
  • [8] Source Characterization and Apportionment of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 by Using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Gugamsetty, Balakrishnaiah
    Wei, Han
    Liu, Chun-Nan
    Awasthi, Amit
    Hsu, Shih-Chieh
    Tsai, Chuen-Jinn
    Roam, Gwo-Dong
    Wu, Yue-Chuen
    Chen, Chung-Fang
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (04) : 476 - 491
  • [9] Source apportionment of PM10 by positive matrix factorization model at a source region of biomass burning
    Saggu, Gurpreet Singh
    Mittal, Susheel Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 266
  • [10] Elemental analysis of PM10 in southwest Mexico City and source apportionment using positive matrix factorization
    Veronica Mejia-Ponce, Lourdes
    Enrique Hernandez-Lopez, Alfonso
    Miranda-Martin-del-Campo, Javier
    Carlos Pineda-Santamaria, Juan
    Reynoso-Cruces, Salvador
    Antonio Mendoza-Flores, Juan
    Antonio Espinosa-Guzman, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2022, 79 (03) : 167 - 198