Improved Adverse Postoperative Outcomes With Revised American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Patients With Cardiac Stents

被引:4
|
作者
Graham, Laura A. [1 ,2 ]
Singletary, Brandon A. [1 ,2 ]
Richman, Joshua S. [1 ,2 ]
Maddox, Thomas M. [3 ,4 ]
Itani, Kamal M. F. [5 ,6 ]
Hawn, Mary T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Surg Med Acute Care Res & Transit, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sect Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver, CO USA
[5] Boston Univ, Dept Surg, Vet Affairs Boston Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; BARE-METAL; PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; CORONARY STENTS; LATE THROMBOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2044
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE In 2007, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were revised for patients with cardiac stents in need of subsequent surgery to recommend delaying elective noncardiac surgery by 365 days in patients with drug-eluting stents (DESs). OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the guidelines on postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in subsequent noncardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients receiving a cardiac stent between fiscal years 2005 and 2010 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes in the Veterans Affairs Medical SAS data sets. The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data were used to identify subsequent operations in the 2 years following stenting. The preguideline period was defined as fiscal years 2005 through 2007 and the postguideline period was defined as fiscal years 2008 through 2010. Surgery patients admitted through the emergency department or transferred from another hospital were excluded from analyses. Overall, 16 634 elective noncardiac operations were identified (8034 [48.3%] in the preguideline period; 8600 [51.7%] in the postguideline period). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Composite 30-day postoperative MACEs. We used chi(2) tests to examine differences in bivariate frequencies and used logistic models to examine adjusted associations with 2-year postoperative MACEs. RESULTS The median time to surgery was 364 days (interquartile range, 184-528 days). A total of 11 026 operations (66.3%) followed DES placement, and 5608 (33.7%) followed bare metal stent placement. After the guidelines' publication, surgery timing increased following DES placement from 323 to 404 days (P < .001) and decreased following bare metal stent placement from 402 to 309 days (P < .001). In addition, postoperative MACE rates decreased from 4.2% to 3.3%(P = .002). After adjusting for cardiac risk factors and procedure characteristics, there was an overall absolute risk reduction of 0.9% for MACEs (odds ratio = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89). On further examination of trends across time, MACE rates with DES placement began to decrease prior to the guidelines' publication from 5.5% in 2005 to 4.3% in 2006 and remained stable through 2010. In contrast, MACE rates with bare metal stent placement increased from 4.3% in 2005 to 8.0% in 2007 but decreased to 4.8% following the guidelines' publication. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE After the guidelines' publication, noncardiac surgery was delayed in patients with DESs but not bare metal stents. With a 26% reduction in MACEs following the guidelines, it would appear that the guidelines did improve postoperative outcomes; however, when examined over time, it becomes evident that there are many more factors influencing management of patients with cardiac stents in need of subsequent surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1120
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] South African Hypertension Society commentary on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines
    Rayner, Brian
    Jones, Erika
    Veriava, Yusuf
    Seedat, Y. K.
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2019, 30 (03) : 184 - 187
  • [32] New Studies Do Not Challenge the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Lipid Guidelines Response
    Hofer, Timothy P.
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (11) : 827 - 828
  • [33] Compliance with the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines for coronary angiography in everyday clinical practice
    Hallani, H
    Hopkins, AP
    Lo, ST
    Juergens, CP
    Nguyen-Do, P
    Leung, DY
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 459 - 459
  • [34] Guidelines on prosthetic heart valve management in infective endocarditis: a narrative review comparing American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines
    Satriano, Umberto Maria
    Nenna, Antonio
    Spadaccio, Cristiano
    Pollari, Francesco
    Fischlein, Theodor
    Chello, Massimo
    Nappi, Francesco
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (23)
  • [35] American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Chronic Heart Failure Evaluation and Management Guidelines: Relevance to the geriatric practice
    Ahmed, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (01) : 123 - 126
  • [36] Contemporary approaches to diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure (summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines)
    Sidorenko, BA
    Preobrazhensky, DV
    Batyraliev, TA
    Marenitch, AV
    Romanova, NE
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2002, 42 (06) : 65 - 78
  • [37] Relationship between procedure indications and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force guidelines
    Anderson, HV
    Shaw, RE
    Brindis, RG
    Klein, LW
    McKay, CR
    Kutcher, MA
    Krone, RJ
    Wolk, MJ
    Smith, SC
    Weintraub, WS
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (18) : 2786 - 2791
  • [38] Levels of Evidence Supporting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, 2008-2018
    Fanaroff, Alexander C.
    Califf, Robert M.
    Windecker, Stephan
    Smith, Sidney C., Jr.
    Lopes, Renato D.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (11): : 1069 - 1080
  • [39] Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy evolving management: American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology vs. European Society of Cardiology guidelines
    Bertero, Edoardo
    Canepa, Marco
    Olivotto, Iacopo
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 46 (04) : 359 - 361
  • [40] Refugee Cardiologists and the Coexistence of the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology
    Taegtmeyer, Heinrich
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (07) : 645 - 646