Improved Adverse Postoperative Outcomes With Revised American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Patients With Cardiac Stents

被引:4
|
作者
Graham, Laura A. [1 ,2 ]
Singletary, Brandon A. [1 ,2 ]
Richman, Joshua S. [1 ,2 ]
Maddox, Thomas M. [3 ,4 ]
Itani, Kamal M. F. [5 ,6 ]
Hawn, Mary T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Surg Med Acute Care Res & Transit, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sect Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver, CO USA
[5] Boston Univ, Dept Surg, Vet Affairs Boston Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; BARE-METAL; PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; CORONARY STENTS; LATE THROMBOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2044
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE In 2007, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were revised for patients with cardiac stents in need of subsequent surgery to recommend delaying elective noncardiac surgery by 365 days in patients with drug-eluting stents (DESs). OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the guidelines on postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in subsequent noncardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients receiving a cardiac stent between fiscal years 2005 and 2010 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes in the Veterans Affairs Medical SAS data sets. The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data were used to identify subsequent operations in the 2 years following stenting. The preguideline period was defined as fiscal years 2005 through 2007 and the postguideline period was defined as fiscal years 2008 through 2010. Surgery patients admitted through the emergency department or transferred from another hospital were excluded from analyses. Overall, 16 634 elective noncardiac operations were identified (8034 [48.3%] in the preguideline period; 8600 [51.7%] in the postguideline period). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Composite 30-day postoperative MACEs. We used chi(2) tests to examine differences in bivariate frequencies and used logistic models to examine adjusted associations with 2-year postoperative MACEs. RESULTS The median time to surgery was 364 days (interquartile range, 184-528 days). A total of 11 026 operations (66.3%) followed DES placement, and 5608 (33.7%) followed bare metal stent placement. After the guidelines' publication, surgery timing increased following DES placement from 323 to 404 days (P < .001) and decreased following bare metal stent placement from 402 to 309 days (P < .001). In addition, postoperative MACE rates decreased from 4.2% to 3.3%(P = .002). After adjusting for cardiac risk factors and procedure characteristics, there was an overall absolute risk reduction of 0.9% for MACEs (odds ratio = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89). On further examination of trends across time, MACE rates with DES placement began to decrease prior to the guidelines' publication from 5.5% in 2005 to 4.3% in 2006 and remained stable through 2010. In contrast, MACE rates with bare metal stent placement increased from 4.3% in 2005 to 8.0% in 2007 but decreased to 4.8% following the guidelines' publication. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE After the guidelines' publication, noncardiac surgery was delayed in patients with DESs but not bare metal stents. With a 26% reduction in MACEs following the guidelines, it would appear that the guidelines did improve postoperative outcomes; however, when examined over time, it becomes evident that there are many more factors influencing management of patients with cardiac stents in need of subsequent surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1120
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Prevalence of Hypertension in Ghana
    Abariga, Samuel A.
    Al Kibria, Gulam Muhammed
    Albrecht, Jennifer S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2020, 102 (06): : 1425 - 1431
  • [22] Are American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association preoperative practice guidelines for stress testing followed?
    Weinstein, H
    Spaltro, B
    Steingart, RM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 402A - 402A
  • [23] Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
    Goossens, Eva
    Fernandes, Susan M.
    Landzberg, Michael J.
    Moons, Philip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 116 (03): : 452 - 457
  • [24] Are the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stable ischemic heart disease guidelines too conservative?
    Rubin, Jonathan
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 12 (10) : 1125 - 1128
  • [25] IMPACT OF ADHERENCE TO 2013 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY AND THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION STATIN GUIDELINES POST-REVASCULARIZATION ON CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES
    Long, Charron
    Elliott, Sarah
    Mydlarz, Derek
    Brixner, Diana
    Megibben, Jennifer
    Simmons, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1812 - 1812
  • [26] Application of the 2017 American college of cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines for cardiovascular outcomes among Tehranian residents
    Zadeh, Seyed Saeed Tamehri
    Moazzeni, Seyyed Saeed
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    Hasheminia, Mitra
    Azizi, Fereidoun
    Hadaegh, Farzad
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (05) : 924 - 932
  • [27] Evolution of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Cardiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: A 10-Year Assessment
    DuBose-Briski, Victoria
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Dhruva, Sanket S.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (19):
  • [28] EVOLUTION OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY AND THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION CARDIOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES: A 10-YEAR ASSESSMENT
    Dubose-Briski, Victoria
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Dunlay, Shannon
    Dhruva, Sanket
    Ross, Joseph
    Shah, Nilay
    Noseworthy, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 3028 - 3028
  • [29] Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Highlights for the Clinician of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines
    Wenger, Nanette K.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [30] Adherence to American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guidelines for exercise tolerance test in cardiovascular clinics
    Hatam, Nahid
    Khales, Vida Razazi
    Askarian, Mehrdad
    Zolghadrasli, Abdolali
    Hooshmand, Shohre
    Ostovan, Mohammadali
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (04) : 305 - 308