Quantification of In Vivo Target Engagement Using Microfluidic Activity-Based Protein Profiling

被引:5
|
作者
Reardon, Holly T. [1 ]
Herbst, Rachel A. [1 ]
Henry, Cassandra L. [1 ]
Herbst, Dylan M. [1 ]
Ngo, Nhi [1 ]
Cisar, Justin S. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Olivia D. [1 ]
Niphakis, Micah J. [1 ]
O'Neill, Gary P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Abide Therapeut, 10835 Rd Cure Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Janssen Res & Dev, Spring House, PA USA
来源
SLAS TECHNOLOGY | 2019年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
ABPP; LabChip; protein chip; monoacylglycerol lipase; MGLL; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1177/2472630319852303
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of drug-target interactions in vivo is critical for both preclinical development and translation to clinical studies, yet many assays rely on indirect measures such as biomarkers associated with target activity. Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is a direct method of quantifying enzyme activity using active site-targeted small-molecule covalent probes that selectively label active but not inhibitor-bound enzymes. Probe-labeled enzymes in complex proteomes are separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quantified by fluorescence imaging. To accelerate workflows and avoid imaging artifacts that make conventional gels challenging to quantify, we adapted protocols for a commercial LabChip GXII microfluidic instrument to permit electrophoretic separation of probe-labeled proteins in tissue lysates and plasma, and quantification of fluorescence (probe/protein labeling ratio of 1:1). Electrophoretic separation on chips occurred in 40 s per sample, and instrument software automatically identified and quantified peaks, resulting in an overall time savings of 3-5 h per 96-well sample plate. Calculated percent inhibition was not significantly different between the two formats. Chip performance was consistent between chips and sample replicates. Conventional gel imaging was more sensitive but required five times higher sample volume than microfluidic chips. Microfluidic chips produced results comparable to those of gels but with much lower sample consumption, facilitating assay miniaturization for scarce biological samples. The time savings afforded by microfluidic electrophoresis and automatic quantification has allowed us to incorporate microfluidic ABPP early in the drug discovery workflow, enabling routine assessments of tissue distribution and engagement of targets and off-targets in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 498
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Application of a Chemical Probe Based on a Neuroprotective Flavonoid Hybrid for Target Identification Using Activity-Based Protein Profiling
    Gunesch, Sandra
    Soriano-Castell, David
    Lamer, Stephanie
    Schlosser, Andreas
    Maher, Pamela
    Decker, Michael
    ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 11 (22): : 3823 - 3837
  • [22] Activity-Based Protein Profiling Identifies Protein Disulfide-Isomerases as Target Proteins of the Volatile Salinilactones
    Jerye, Karoline
    Lueken, Helko
    Steffen, Anika
    Schlawis, Christian
    Jaensch, Lothar
    Schulz, Stefan
    Broenstrup, Mark
    ADVANCED SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (18)
  • [23] Activity-Based Protein Profiling of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 1
    Obianyo, Obiamaka
    Causey, Corey P.
    Jones, Justin E.
    Thompson, Paul R.
    ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 6 (10) : 1127 - 1135
  • [24] Bioorthogonal Chemistry: Applications in Activity-Based Protein Profiling
    Willems, Lianne I.
    Van der Linden, Wouter A.
    Li, Nan
    Li, Kah-Yee
    Liu, Nora
    Hoogendoorn, Sascha
    Van der Marel, Gijs A.
    Florea, Bogdan I.
    Overkleeft, Herman S.
    ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 44 (09) : 718 - 729
  • [25] Enzyme Inhibitor Discovery by Activity-Based Protein Profiling
    Niphakis, Micah J.
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 83, 2014, 83 : 341 - 377
  • [26] The development and application of methods for activity-based protein profiling
    Jessani, N
    Cravatt, BF
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 8 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [27] Activity-based protein profiling in microbes and the gut microbiome
    Han, Lin
    Chang, Pamela V.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 76
  • [28] Activity-Based Protein Profiling for the Study of Parasite Biology
    Benns, Henry J.
    Tate, Edward W.
    Child, Matthew A.
    ACTIVITY-BASED PROTEIN PROFILING, 2019, 420 : 155 - 174
  • [29] Opportunities and Challenges in Activity-Based Protein Profiling of Mycobacteria
    Patel, Hiren V.
    Li, Michael
    Seeliger, Jessica C.
    ACTIVITY-BASED PROTEIN PROFILING, 2019, 420 : 49 - 72
  • [30] Activity-based protein profiling: From enzyme chemistry
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    Wright, Aaron T.
    Kozarich, John W.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 77 : 383 - 414