Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion

被引:66
|
作者
Johnson, GH [1 ]
Chellis, KD [1 ]
Gordon, GE [1 ]
Lepe, X [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 1998年 / 79卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70160-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Because irreversible hydrocolloid impressions imbibe blood and saliva, immersion rather than spray disinfection map be more effective. Polyether has been shown to be dimensionally sensitive to immersion disinfection. Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine whether irreversible hydrocolloid and polyether impressions could be disinfected by immersion without sacrificing accuracy and surface quality. Material and methods. Impressions were made of a master mandibular arch containing a crown preparation. Changes between the master and working casts were assessed. Irreversible hydrocolloids (Jeltrate; Palgaflex), a polyether (Impregum F), and an addition silicone (President) were used. Disinfectants were an iodophor (Biocide), a glyoxal glutaraldehyde (Impresept de), and a phenol glutaraldehyde (Sporicidin). The control was without disinfection. Casts were formed in Type IV gypsum. The roughness of working dies was also recorded and an analysis of variance was used for statistical evaluation Results. Casts from disinfected irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions maintained accuracy for anteroposterior and cross arch dimensions where differences from the master was less than 0.1%. Buccolingual and mesiodistal dimensions of working dies (disinfected and control) were 6 to 8 mu m larger than the master for addition silicones and 11 to 16 mu m for polyethers. The occlusogingival dimension of dies for control and disinfected polyether was 9 mu m longer than the master compared with -3 mu m for addition silicone. The range of mean surface roughness of working dies made from irreversible hydrocolloids was 1.4 to 1.7 mu m and ranged from 0.5 to 0.7 mu m for elastomeric impressions. Conclusion. Immersion disinfection of Jeltrate material with iodophor and Palgaflex material with glyoxal glutaraldehyde produced casts and dies as accurate as the control. Control and disinfected elastomeric impression produced dies as clinically accurate and smooth as the master. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with the glyoxal and phenol glutaraldehyde produced a surface smoother than controls.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 453
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Effect of Incorporation of Disinfectant Solutions on Setting Time, Linear Dimensional Stability, and Detail Reproduction in Dental Stone Casts
    Lucas, Matheus Guilherme
    Arioli-Filho, Joao Neudenir
    Nogueira, Sergio Sualdini
    Dantas Batista, Andre Ulisses
    Pereira, Rodrigo De Paula
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (06): : 521 - 526
  • [42] Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips
    Maluly-Proni, Ana Teresa
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    Fraga Briso, Andre Luiz
    Marson, Fabiano Carlos
    dos Santos, Paulo Henrique
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (05): : 759 - 764
  • [43] Surface Detail Reproduction and Effect of Disinfectant and Long-Term Storage on the Dimensional Stability of a Novel Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Material
    Nassar, Usama
    Chow, Ava K.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (06): : 494 - 498
  • [44] Comparative evaluation of surface detail reproduction and dimensional stability of poly ether, vinyl siloxane, and vinyl siloxane ether impression materials: An In vitro study
    Rose, Shyma
    Aravindakshan, Shyammohan
    Usman, Jafar Abdulla Mohamed
    Mohamed, Raza
    Menon, Sheethel
    Shafiullah, Rahmath Shameem
    Salloum, Mahmoud Gamal
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05): : 851 - 856