Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging

被引:19
|
作者
Ma, Ting Martin [1 ]
Gafita, Andrei [2 ]
Shabsovich, David [1 ]
Juarez, Jesus [1 ]
Grogan, Tristan R. [3 ]
Thin, Pan [2 ]
Armstrong, Wesley [2 ]
Sonni, Ida [2 ]
Nguyen, Kathleen [2 ]
Lok, Vincent [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [4 ]
Rettig, Matthew B. [4 ,5 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick A. [1 ]
Yang, David D. [6 ]
Muralidhar, Vinayak [6 ]
Chu, Carissa [7 ]
Feng, Felix [7 ,8 ]
Savjani, Ricky [1 ]
Deng, Jie [1 ]
Parikh, Neil R. [1 ]
Nickols, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Elashoff, David [3 ]
Czernin, Johannes [2 ]
Calais, Jeremie [2 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Mol & Med Pharmacol, Ahmanson Translat Theranost Div, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Stat Core, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Radiat Oncol Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Staging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Conventional imaging; Overall upstaging; Percent positive core; Gleason grade; Nomogram;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensi-tivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histo-logic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001). Overall upstaging was signifi- cantly more frequent among men with GG 5 disease (33.0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.0097) and PPC >= 50% (33.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.0020). We constructed a nomogram that predicts overall upstaging using initial prostate-specific antigen, PPC, GG, and cT stage, with coefficients estimated from a standard logistic regression model (using maximum likelihood estimation). It is internally validated with a tenfold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimated at 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82). In our cohort, 90% of patients who had a nomogram-estimated risk below the cutoff of 22% for overall upstaging could have been spared PSMA PET/CT as our model correctly predicted no upstaging. In other words, the predictive model only missed 10% of patients who would otherwise have benefitted from PSMA PET/CT. Patient summary: We analyzed predictors of overall upstaging (lymph node or/ and metastasis) by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from conventional imaging in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing initial staging deemed free of disease in the lymph nodes and distant metastasis by conventional imaging techniques. We found that the pathologic grade and disease burden in a prostate biopsy are associated with upstaging. We also developed a tool that predicts the probability of upstaging according to an individual patient's characteristics. Our study may help in defining patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the addition of a PSMA PET/CT scan. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Making the case for prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography/computed tomography in suspected prostate cancer
    Singh, Harmandeep
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04): : 281 - 282
  • [32] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced, Recurrent, and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Reply
    Lindenberg, Liza
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (05) : 749 - 750
  • [33] Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with diagnostic computed tomography in relapsed prostate cancer
    Asokendaran, Marcus Edward
    Meyrick, Danielle P.
    Skelly, Laura A.
    Lenzo, Nat P.
    Henderson, Andrew
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [34] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in the management of recurrent prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 128 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [35] The Role of Radiolabeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Renal Cancer
    Evangelista, Laura
    Basso, Umberto
    Maruzzo, Marco
    Novara, Giacomo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [36] Diagnostic performance of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
    El Hajj, Albert
    Yacoub, Basel
    Mansour, Mazen
    Khauli, Raja
    Bulbul, Mohamad
    Nassif, Samer
    Haidar, Mohamad B.
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44) : e17491
  • [37] Transcriptomic Heterogeneity in High-risk Prostate Cancer and Implications for Extraprostatic Disease at Presentation on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography
    Smith, Clayton P.
    Proudfoot, James A.
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Valle, Luca
    Rettig, Matthew B.
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Nagar, Himanshu
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Attard, Gert
    Weiner, Adam
    Weidhaas, Joanne B.
    Calais, Jeremie
    Ma, T. Martin
    Davicioni, Elai
    Xiang, Michael
    Kishan, Amar U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (02): : 224 - 227
  • [38] Stellenwert der PSMA-PET/CT („prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography“) im Rahmen des StagingsRole of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) in staging
    Claudia Kesch
    Tobias Franiel
    Christoph Berliner
    Wolfgang P. Fendler
    Ken Herrmann
    Boris Hadaschik
    Die Urologie, 2025, 64 (3) : 220 - 228
  • [39] The Evaluation of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Initial Staging in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Guglielmo, Priscilla
    Giacoppo, Giulia
    Setti, Lucia
    Arico, Demetrio
    Muraglia, Lorenzo
    Marzo, Katia
    Buffi, Nicolo
    Fasulo, Vittorio
    Rodari, Marcello
    Jandric, Jelena
    Salvaggio, Antonio
    Bonacina, Manuela
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (23)
  • [40] Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial
    Cardet, Rafael E. de Feria
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Segard, Tatiana
    Yim, Jackie
    Williams, Scott
    Francis, Roslyn J.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (03) : 413 - 418