Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging

被引:19
|
作者
Ma, Ting Martin [1 ]
Gafita, Andrei [2 ]
Shabsovich, David [1 ]
Juarez, Jesus [1 ]
Grogan, Tristan R. [3 ]
Thin, Pan [2 ]
Armstrong, Wesley [2 ]
Sonni, Ida [2 ]
Nguyen, Kathleen [2 ]
Lok, Vincent [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [4 ]
Rettig, Matthew B. [4 ,5 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick A. [1 ]
Yang, David D. [6 ]
Muralidhar, Vinayak [6 ]
Chu, Carissa [7 ]
Feng, Felix [7 ,8 ]
Savjani, Ricky [1 ]
Deng, Jie [1 ]
Parikh, Neil R. [1 ]
Nickols, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Elashoff, David [3 ]
Czernin, Johannes [2 ]
Calais, Jeremie [2 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Mol & Med Pharmacol, Ahmanson Translat Theranost Div, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Stat Core, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Radiat Oncol Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Staging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Conventional imaging; Overall upstaging; Percent positive core; Gleason grade; Nomogram;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensi-tivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histo-logic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001). Overall upstaging was signifi- cantly more frequent among men with GG 5 disease (33.0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.0097) and PPC >= 50% (33.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.0020). We constructed a nomogram that predicts overall upstaging using initial prostate-specific antigen, PPC, GG, and cT stage, with coefficients estimated from a standard logistic regression model (using maximum likelihood estimation). It is internally validated with a tenfold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimated at 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82). In our cohort, 90% of patients who had a nomogram-estimated risk below the cutoff of 22% for overall upstaging could have been spared PSMA PET/CT as our model correctly predicted no upstaging. In other words, the predictive model only missed 10% of patients who would otherwise have benefitted from PSMA PET/CT. Patient summary: We analyzed predictors of overall upstaging (lymph node or/ and metastasis) by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from conventional imaging in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing initial staging deemed free of disease in the lymph nodes and distant metastasis by conventional imaging techniques. We found that the pathologic grade and disease burden in a prostate biopsy are associated with upstaging. We also developed a tool that predicts the probability of upstaging according to an individual patient's characteristics. Our study may help in defining patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the addition of a PSMA PET/CT scan. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia
    Song, Rachel
    Jeet, Varinder
    Sharma, Rajan
    Hoyle, Martin
    Parkinson, Bonny
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (08) : 807 - 821
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia
    Rachel Song
    Varinder Jeet
    Rajan Sharma
    Martin Hoyle
    Bonny Parkinson
    PharmacoEconomics, 2022, 40 : 807 - 821
  • [23] Evolving Paradigms in Prostate Cancer: The Integral Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography in Primary Staging and Therapeutic Decision-Making
    Udovicich, Cristian
    Jia, Angela Y.
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Eapen, Renu
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Siva, Shankar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2025, 121 (02): : 307 - 316
  • [24] Role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) in staging
    Kesch, Claudia
    Franiel, Tobias
    Berliner, Christoph
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Hadaschik, Boris
    UROLOGIE, 2025,
  • [25] Patterns of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Brachytherapy Determined by Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Imaging
    Raman, Srinivas
    Keyes, Mira
    Oh, Justin
    Rousseau, Etienne
    Krauze, Andra
    Wilson, Don
    Benard, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (05): : 1126 - 1134
  • [26] Risk of metastatic disease on 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan for primary staging of 1253 men at the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Yaxley, John W.
    Raveenthiran, Sheliyan
    Nouhaud, Francois-Xavier
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Yaxley, William J.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Yaxley, Anna J.
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Kua, Boon
    McEwan, Louise
    Wong, David
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (03) : 401 - 407
  • [27] Research progress on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer
    Li Y.
    Liu B.
    Yuan Y.
    Qin W.
    Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 39 (06): : 1263 - 1268
  • [28] In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
    Kulkarni, Smita Chinmay
    Sundaram, Palaniswamy Shanmuga
    Padma, Subramanyam
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 41 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [29] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Prognostication
    Huynh, Linda My
    Swanson, Shea
    Cima, Sophia
    Haddadin, Eliana
    Baine, Michael
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [30] Diagnostic Accuracy of 64Copper Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate-to High-risk Prostate Cancer: Our Preliminary Experience
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Gangemi, Vincenzo
    Cascini, Giuseppe Lucio
    Calabria, Ferdinando
    Moschini, Marco
    Ferro, Matteo
    Musi, Gennaro
    Buttice, Salvatore
    Salonia, Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Damiano, Rocco
    UROLOGY, 2017, 106 : 139 - 145