Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging

被引:19
|
作者
Ma, Ting Martin [1 ]
Gafita, Andrei [2 ]
Shabsovich, David [1 ]
Juarez, Jesus [1 ]
Grogan, Tristan R. [3 ]
Thin, Pan [2 ]
Armstrong, Wesley [2 ]
Sonni, Ida [2 ]
Nguyen, Kathleen [2 ]
Lok, Vincent [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [4 ]
Rettig, Matthew B. [4 ,5 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick A. [1 ]
Yang, David D. [6 ]
Muralidhar, Vinayak [6 ]
Chu, Carissa [7 ]
Feng, Felix [7 ,8 ]
Savjani, Ricky [1 ]
Deng, Jie [1 ]
Parikh, Neil R. [1 ]
Nickols, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Elashoff, David [3 ]
Czernin, Johannes [2 ]
Calais, Jeremie [2 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Mol & Med Pharmacol, Ahmanson Translat Theranost Div, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Stat Core, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Radiat Oncol Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Staging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Conventional imaging; Overall upstaging; Percent positive core; Gleason grade; Nomogram;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensi-tivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histo-logic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001). Overall upstaging was signifi- cantly more frequent among men with GG 5 disease (33.0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.0097) and PPC >= 50% (33.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.0020). We constructed a nomogram that predicts overall upstaging using initial prostate-specific antigen, PPC, GG, and cT stage, with coefficients estimated from a standard logistic regression model (using maximum likelihood estimation). It is internally validated with a tenfold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimated at 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82). In our cohort, 90% of patients who had a nomogram-estimated risk below the cutoff of 22% for overall upstaging could have been spared PSMA PET/CT as our model correctly predicted no upstaging. In other words, the predictive model only missed 10% of patients who would otherwise have benefitted from PSMA PET/CT. Patient summary: We analyzed predictors of overall upstaging (lymph node or/ and metastasis) by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from conventional imaging in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing initial staging deemed free of disease in the lymph nodes and distant metastasis by conventional imaging techniques. We found that the pathologic grade and disease burden in a prostate biopsy are associated with upstaging. We also developed a tool that predicts the probability of upstaging according to an individual patient's characteristics. Our study may help in defining patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the addition of a PSMA PET/CT scan. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography, Not Conventional Imaging, Should Be Performed for Primary Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    van der Poel, Henk
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 34 : 68 - 69
  • [2] Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography, Not Conventional Imaging, Should Be Performed for Primary Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Ceci, Francesco
    Musi, Gennaro
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 34 : 17 - 18
  • [3] Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of high-risk prostate cancer
    Petersen, Lars J.
    Zacho, Helle D.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (06) : 498 - 501
  • [4] Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography, Not Conventional Imaging, Should Be Performed for Primary Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer (vol 34, pg 17, 2021)
    Ceci, Francesco
    Musi, Gennaro
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 39 : 47 - 47
  • [5] Microcosting Study of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer
    Parkinson, Bonny
    Sharma, Rajan
    Jeet, Varinder
    Song, Rachel
    Hoyle, Martin
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 32 : 17 - 22
  • [6] Risk of Tumor Upstaging With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Brant, Aaron
    Lewicki, Patrick
    Xiang, Michael
    Zhu, Alec
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Pollom, Erqi Liu
    Shoag, Jonathan E.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (09) : E2231101
  • [7] Using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography to guide prostate biopsies and stage men at high-risk of prostate cancer
    Bodar, Yves J. L.
    Boeve, Liselotte M. S.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Baars, Phillippe C.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
    van Haarst, Ernst P.
    Oddens, Jorg R.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    van Riel, Luigi A. M. J. G.
    Scheltema, Matthijs J.
    Meijer, Dennie
    Hendrikse, N. Harry
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Vis, Andre N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (06) : 705 - 712
  • [8] Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligands as a Promising Tool for Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Kopka, Klaus
    Hadaschik, Boris
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 397 - 399
  • [9] Accuracy Versus Impact: The Referee Verdict on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Staging of Prostate Cancer
    O'Brien, Jonathan
    Chen, Kenneth
    Murphy, Declan G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 34 : 83 - 85
  • [10] Bringing clarity or confusion? The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission/computed tomography for primary staging in prostate cancer
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Hofman, Michael
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Maurer, Tobias
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (02) : 194 - 195