Optimizing an analytical dose calculation algorithm for fast 2D calculations

被引:0
|
作者
Lorenz, Friedlieb [1 ]
Richter, Henning [2 ]
Zygmanski, Piotr [3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mannheim Med Ctr, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dana Farber Brigham & Womens Canc Ctr, Boston, MA USA
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2010年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Dose calculation; MLC transmission; independent verification; RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE; SPATIAL DEPENDENCE; MLC TRANSMISSION; RADIOTHERAPY; DELIVERY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.12.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Previously, an analytical dose calculation algorithm for MLC-based radiotherapy was developed and commissioned, which includes a detailed model of various MLC effects as a unique feature [1]. The algorithm was originally developed as an independent verification of the treatment planning system's dose calculation and it explicitly modeled spatial and depth dependent MLC effects such as interleaf transmission, the tongue-and-groove effect, rounded leaf ends, MLC scatter, beam hardening, and divergence of the beam, which in turn resulted in a gradual MLC transmission frill-off with increasing off-axis distance. Originally the algorithm was implemented in Mathematica (TM) (Wolfram). To speed up the calculation time and to be able to calculate high resolution 2D dose distributions within a reasonable time frame (<2 s) the algorithm needs to be optimized and to be embedded in a user friendly environment. To achieve this goal, the dose calculation model is implemented in VisualBasic 6.0, which decreases the calculation time moderately. More importantly, the numerical algorithm for dose calculation is changed at two levels: the dose contributions are split into their x- and y-contributions and the calculation is aperture- rather than as originally point-based. Implementing these three major changes, the calculation time is reduced considerably without loosing accuracy. The time for a typical IMRT field with about 2500 calculation points decreased from 2387 seconds to 0.624 seconds (a factor of about 3800). The mean agreement of the optimized and the not optimized calculation algorithm at the isocenter fir a fairly complex IMRT plan with 23 fields is better than 1% relative to the local dose at the measuring point.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 2D Chromatography and 2D Spectroscopy in Analytical Chemistry: an Overview
    Sudheeshna, M.
    Malarvannan, M.
    Kumar, K. Vinod
    Kumar, G. Kranthi
    Reddy, Y. Padmanabha
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 78 (09) : 1213 - 1230
  • [42] 2D Chromatography and 2D Spectroscopy in Analytical Chemistry: an Overview
    M. Sudheeshna
    M. Malarvannan
    K. Vinod Kumar
    G. Kranthi Kumar
    Y. Padmanabha Reddy
    Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 78 : 1213 - 1230
  • [43] Comparison of Acuros and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm for dose calculations in VMAT treatments
    Ambroa Rey, E. M.
    Rodriguez Meijide, P.
    Perez Fernandez, M.
    Lopez Sanchez, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S725 - S726
  • [44] Numerical Calculation of Reflection Characteristics of Grooved Surfaces with a 2D FDTD Algorithm
    Burkhard Plaum
    Eberhard Holzhauer
    Carsten Lechte
    Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 2011, 32 : 482 - 495
  • [45] Numerical Calculation of Reflection Characteristics of Grooved Surfaces with a 2D FDTD Algorithm
    Plaum, Burkhard
    Holzhauer, Eberhard
    Lechte, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF INFRARED MILLIMETER AND TERAHERTZ WAVES, 2011, 32 (04) : 482 - 495
  • [46] ELECTRON DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL PHANTOMS - A COMPARISON WITH 2D PENCIL BEAM CALCULATIONS
    CYGLER, J
    BATTISTA, JJ
    SCRIMGER, JW
    MAH, E
    ANTOLAK, J
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (09): : 1073 - 1086
  • [47] Improved photon dose calculation in the lung with the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA)
    Huyskens, D.
    Van Esch, A.
    Pyykkonen, J.
    Tenhunen, M.
    Hannu Helminen, H.
    Tillikainen, L.
    Siljamaki, S.
    Alakuijala, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S513 - S513
  • [48] Fast and Accurate 2D Analytical Subdomain Method for Coaxial Magnetic Coupling Analysis
    Akcay, Yusuf
    Giangrande, Paolo
    Tweedy, Oliver
    Galea, Michael
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (15)
  • [49] Validation of a new photon dose calculation model - Analytical anisotropic algorithm
    Rong, Y.
    Mubata, C.
    Chisela, W.
    Jaradat, H.
    Tewatia, D.
    Paliwal, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2148 - 2149
  • [50] Fast 2D hybrid fluid-analytical simulation of inductive/capacitive discharges
    Kawamura, E.
    Graves, D. B.
    Lieberman, M. A.
    PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20 (03):