Behaviour and performance of suckling gilts and their piglets in single housing with different fixation times

被引:1
|
作者
Wassmuth, Ralf [1 ]
Biestmann, Christoph [2 ]
Janssen, Heiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci, Kruempel 31, D-49090 Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Chamber Agr Lower Saxony, Mars La Tour Str 6, D-26121 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
SOWS;
D O I
10.5194/aab-60-101-2017
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective was to evaluate suckling performance and behaviour traits of gilts and piglets in two different single-housing farrowing systems under practical conditions. Performance data of 70 crossbred gilts and their 842 piglets were collected. The behavioural observation included 17 gilts and 211 piglets. Gilts of the control group (full-time crating, FTC) were fixed during farrowing and suckling (Pro Dromi((R)) 1), and in the experimental group (short-time crating, STC) gilts were fixed for 6 days postpartum (p. p.) only (Pro Dromi((R)) 1.5). Six farrowing crates were included in each group, and six replications were carried out. Performance data were collected and gilts' and piglets' behaviour was observed with 10 min scan samples and categorized by standing, walking (only in STC), sitting and lying (side and belly). The management and the housing systems were in accordance with the Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung (TierSchNutztV, 2017). No significant (p > 0.05) differences between FTC and STC were found in piglets born alive (13.2 and 13.9, respectively), loss of piglets (1.4 and 1.55, respectively) and weaned piglets including cross-fostering (12.0 and 12.4, respectively). Piglet loss due to crushing was 0.6 (FTC) and 0.64 (STC), with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Overall, 82.5% of all piglets killed due to crushing were lost from farrowing to day 2 p. p. The daily gain of STC piglets was significantly higher than that of FTC piglets (205 g vs. 199 g, respectively; p < 0.05) during the suckling period (3 weeks). Concerning gilts' behaviour, significant differences (p <= 0.05) were found in sitting duration only (FTC 5.8% and STC 4.0 %, respectively). FTC piglets spent more time lying, sitting and standing (7.4% vs. 4.4 %, 0.5% vs. 0.4 %, 9.6% vs. 8.4 %, respectively; p <= 0.05). The reason could be the higher acceptance of the piglet nest in STC. It was possible to conclude that gilts' welfare was improved by STC compared to FTC, and farrowing crates with loose single housing did not lead to higher piglet loss in the suckling period. An earlier end of the fixation period of the gilt at day 2 or 3 p. p. should be tested.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 104
页数:4
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Effects of pre-weaning housing in a multi-suckling system on performance and carbohydrate absorption of relatively light and heavy piglets around weaning
    van Nieuwamerongen, S. E.
    Bolhuis, J. E.
    van der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C.
    Kemp, B.
    Soede, N. M.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (04) : 802 - 809
  • [22] Confinement of sows for different periods during lactation: effects on behaviour and lesions of sows and performance of piglets
    Lambertz, C.
    Petig, M.
    Elkmann, A.
    Gauly, M.
    ANIMAL, 2015, 9 (08) : 1373 - 1378
  • [23] METHOD FOR ZOOLOGY-AND-HYGIENIC PREDICTION OF THE PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF THE FIRST LITTER GILTS AND SUCKLING PIGLETS OBTAINED FROM THEM ACCORDING TO THE SOWS' BODY DEFENSES AND INDICATORS OF THEIR HEMATOLOGICAL PROFILE
    Solyanik, S., V
    Hochenkov, A. A.
    Tanana, L. A.
    Pestis, M., V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BELARUS-AGRARIAN SERIES, 2018, 56 (02): : 200 - 212
  • [24] THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STRETCHING TIMES ON SINGLE-LEG JUMP PERFORMANCE
    Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
    Soares, Enrico Gori
    Domingues Oliveira Silva, Fernando Henrique
    de Medeiros, Iris Ilza
    Neto, Ilidio dos Reis
    Lopes, Charles Ricardo
    Uchida, Marco Carlos
    Bacurau, Reury Frank
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA DO ESPORTE, 2014, 20 (03) : 223 - 226
  • [25] A Single-Dose Intramuscular Nanoparticle Vaccine With or Without Prior Intrauterine Priming Triggers Specific Uterine and Colostral Mucosal Antibodies and Systemic Immunity in Gilts but Not Passive Protection for Suckling Piglets
    Choudhary, Pooja
    Khajavinia, Amir
    Mohammadi, Ramin
    Ng, Siew Hon
    Berube, Nathalie
    Yalamati, Damayanthi
    Haddadi, Azita
    Wilson, Heather L.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [26] Effects of different single and group housing systems of nursing sows on management, productivity and animal behaviour
    Fritsch, U
    Boxberger, J
    APPROPRIATE HOUSING SYSTEMS FOR FARM ANIMALS: NEWER DEVELOPMENTS AND SOLUTIONS, 1997, (45): : 53 - 63
  • [27] METHOD FOR ZOOLOGY-AND-HYGIENIC PREDICTION OF VALUES OF HEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND NATURAL RESISTANCE OF THE FIRST LITTER GILTS' BODY ACCORDING TO THE PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF SOWS AND SUCKLING PIGLETS OBTAINED FROM THEM
    Solyanik, S., V
    Khochenkov, A. A.
    Zaytseva, N. B.
    Pestis, M., V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BELARUS-AGRARIAN SERIES, 2018, 56 (04): : 456 - 468
  • [28] Effects of Two Different Methods of Teeth Grinding on Dental Injuries, Skin Lesions, Growth and Behaviour of Suckling Piglets Compared to a Non-Treated Control Group
    Timphaus, Carolin Bernarda
    Kleine Kruthaup, Franziska Anna
    Freise, Fritjof
    Herbrandt, Swetlana
    Grosse Beilage, Elisabeth
    Fels, Michaela
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [29] Comparison of performance, body constitution and behaviour of sows in different housing-systems .2. Behaviour of sows during pregnancy
    Lembeck, J
    Wassmuth, R
    Glodek, F
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1996, 68 (03): : 204 - 217
  • [30] Effects of Different Housing Systems during Suckling and Rearing Period on Skin and Tail Lesions, Tail Losses and Performance of Growing and Finishing Pigs
    Lange, Anita
    Hahne, Michael
    Lambertz, Christian
    Gauly, Matthias
    Wendt, Michael
    Janssen, Heiko
    Traulsen, Imke
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (08):