Effects of Different Housing Systems during Suckling and Rearing Period on Skin and Tail Lesions, Tail Losses and Performance of Growing and Finishing Pigs

被引:4
|
作者
Lange, Anita [1 ]
Hahne, Michael [2 ]
Lambertz, Christian [3 ]
Gauly, Matthias [3 ]
Wendt, Michael [2 ]
Janssen, Heiko [4 ]
Traulsen, Imke [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Livestock Syst, Albrecht Thaer Weg 3, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Vet Med Hannover, Clin Swine Small Ruminants, Forens Med & Ambulatory Serv, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Piazza Univ 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[4] Chamber Agr Lower Saxony, Mars la Tour Str 6, D-26121 Oldenburg, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
farrowing systems; early socialization; rearing in the farrowing pen; tail biting; average daily gain; FARROWING SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; SOCIALISING PIGLETS; LACTATING SOWS; BEHAVIOR; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.3390/ani11082184
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Weaning involves multiple stressors and is one of the most critical periods for piglets. It is known that pigs try to compensate stressful events by different coping strategies that might culminate in the biting of other pigs. The reduction in the number of stressors by optimizing housing conditions might be a way to reduce tail biting, one huge challenge in modern pig production. Since tail docking as a measure to avoid injuries is banned by EU regulations, this study aims to present alternatives to combat tail biting. The present work shows that the group housing of lactating sows and their litters improves pig welfare after regrouping events in terms of skin lesions. Rearing in the farrowing pen with reduced regrouping positively affected the incidence of tail lesions and losses of undocked pigs. Against expectations, free farrowing and group housing systems had no negative impact on later performance during rearing or fattening. Feasible alternatives to stressful weaning and tail-docking are needed to inhibit tail biting. Therefore, we investigated the effects of housing systems for 1106 pigs that were weaned from: (1) conventional farrowing crates (FC), (2) free-farrowing pens (FF), or (3) group housing of lactating sows (GH) into (1) conventional rearing pens (Conv) or (2) piglets remained in their farrowing pens for rearing (Reaf). Tails were docked or left undocked batchwise. All pigs were regrouped for the fattening period. Pigs were scored for skin lesions, tail lesions and losses. After weaning, Conv-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv-FC and Conv-FF pigs. After regrouping for fattening, Reaf-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv pigs, Reaf-FC and Reaf-FF. The frequency of tail lesions of undocked Conv pigs peaked in week 4 (66.8%). Two weeks later, Reaf undocked pigs reached their maximum (36.2%). At the end of fattening, 99.3% of undocked Conv pigs and 43.1% of undocked Reaf pigs lost parts of their tail. In conclusion, the co-mingling of piglets during suckling reduced the incidence of skin lesions. Rearing in the farrowing pen significantly reduced the incidence of tail lesions and losses for undocked pigs. No housing system negatively affected the performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classification of Pigs with Tail Lesions from Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems during Rearing and Fattening Period
    Gentz, Maria
    Lange, Anita
    Zeidler, Sebastian
    Traulsen, Imke
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [2] Tail Lesions and Losses of Docked and Undocked Pigs in Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems
    Gentz, Maria
    Lange, Anita
    Zeidler, Sebastian
    Lambertz, Christian
    Gauly, Matthias
    Burfeind, Onno
    Traulsen, Imke
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [3] Old breeds, new solutions? Effects of two different traditional sire breeds on skin lesions, tail lesions, tail losses, performance and behaviour of rearing pigs
    Lange, A.
    Wutke, M.
    Ammer, S.
    Appel, A. K.
    Henne, H.
    Deermann, A.
    Traulsen, I.
    ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (03)
  • [4] Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system
    Li, Y. Z.
    Zhang, H. F.
    Johnston, L. J.
    Martin, W.
    Peterson, J. D.
    Coetzee, J. F.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 95 (11) : 4835 - 4845
  • [5] Is tail biting in growing pigs reduced by a prolonged suckling period?
    Naya, Ashley
    Traulsen, Imke
    Gertz, Marvin
    Hasler, Mario
    Burfeind, Onno
    Beilage, Elisabeth Grosse
    Krieter, Joachim
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2019, 211 : 41 - 46
  • [6] Tail and ear postures of growing pigs in two different housing conditions
    Czycholl, I
    Hauschild, E.
    Buettner, K.
    Krugmann, K.
    Burfeind, O.
    Krieter, J.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2020, 176
  • [7] Effects of an intensified human-animal interaction on tail biting in pigs during the rearing period
    Buettner, Kathrin
    Czycholl, Irena
    Basler, Heidi
    Krieter, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 156 (08): : 1039 - 1046
  • [8] Influence of Group Size on Performance and Tail Damage Caused by Tail Biting in Undocked Growing-Finishing Pigs
    Archer, Courtney
    Hilbrands, Adrienne
    Johnston, Lee J.
    Mote, Benny E.
    Schmidt, Ty B.
    Li, Yuzhi
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [9] Influence of litter origin on performance and tail biting in growing-finishing pigs
    Archer, Courtney
    Hilbrands, Adrienne
    Mote, Benny E.
    Schmidt, Ty B.
    Johnston, Lee J.
    Li, Yuzhi
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 5 - 6
  • [10] Influence of litter origin on performance and tail biting in growing-finishing pigs
    Archer, Courtney
    Hilbrands, Adrienne
    Mote, Benny E.
    Schmidt, Ty B.
    Johnston, Lee J.
    Li, Yuzhi
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 5 - 6