Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species

被引:8
|
作者
Raithel, Clara U. [1 ,2 ]
Gottfried, Jay A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Neurol, 3400 Hamilton Walk,Stemmler Hall,Room G10, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, 425 S Univ Ave,Stephen A Levin Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
Olfaction; Odor; Stimulus-response learning; Spatial navigation; Cognitive maps; OLFACTORY NAVIGATION; PATH-INTEGRATION; COGNITIVE MAP; NEURAL BASIS; SPATIAL MAP; ODOR; MECHANISMS; PLACE; BEHAVIOR; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Olfaction is arguably the least valued among our sensory systems, and its significance for human behavior is often neglected. Spatial navigation represents no exception to the rule: humans are often characterized as purely visual navigators, a view that undermines the contribution of olfactory cues. Accordingly, research investigating whether and how humans use olfaction to navigate space is rare. In comparison, research on olfactory navigation in non-human species is abundant, and identifies behavioral strategies along with neural mechanisms characterizing the use of olfactory cues during spatial tasks. Using an ethological approach, our review draws from studies on olfactory navigation across species to describe the adaptation of strategies under the influence of selective pressure. Mammals interact with spatial environments by abstracting multisensory information into cognitive maps. We thus argue that olfactory cues, alongside inputs from other sensory modalities, play a crucial role in spatial navigation for mammalian species, including humans; that is, odors constitute one of the many building blocks in the formation of cognitive maps.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 779
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning to find your way: A role for the human hippocampal formation
    Maguire, EA
    Frackowiak, RSJ
    Frith, CD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1377) : 1745 - 1750
  • [2] Human behaviour: Find your voice
    Julia Rosen
    Nature, 2016, 540 (7631) : 157 - 159
  • [3] Theory of Mind Precursors: Comparisons Between Human and Non-Human Primates
    Saiz Manzanares, Maria Consuelo
    FOLIA PRIMATOLOGICA, 2018, 89 (3-4) : 212 - 212
  • [4] Feel your way to being human
    Anderson, Alun
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 237 (3168) : 44 - 45
  • [5] Revisiting Darwin's comparisons between human and non-human primate facial signals
    Kavanagh, Eithne
    Kimock, Clare
    Whitehouse, Jamie
    Micheletta, Jerome
    Waller, Bridget M.
    EVOLUTIONARY HUMAN SCIENCES, 2022, 4 : 1034 - 1041
  • [6] Socioanthropological Synthesis of Ethological Studies on Rituals in Non-Human Species Towards the Development of an Integrated Approach
    Pejic, Sonja
    ANTHROPOS, 2021, 116 (01) : 187 - 198
  • [7] Species identification of teeth of human and non-human
    Wei, Xin
    Yu, Kai
    Wu, Hao
    Shen, Chen
    Li, Huiyu
    Liu, Ruina
    Sun, Qinru
    Wang, Zhenyuan
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 333
  • [8] Retinal transplantation between different species of non-human primates
    Barron, BC
    Rapizzi, E
    Capone, A
    Kapp, JA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S853 - S853
  • [9] Phenomenology of Androids: Between Human and Non-human
    Shaev, Yury
    Samoylova, Elena
    2019 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT), 2019, : 261 - 265