A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant

被引:63
|
作者
Rettwitz-Volk, W
Veldman, A
Roth, B
Vierzig, A
Kachel, W
Varnholt, V
Schlösser, R
von Loewenich, V
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Pediat, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Pediat, Mannheim, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS | 1998年 / 132卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70440-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) as a primary ventilation mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Primary end points were survival and maintenance of the randomized ventilation mode. Study design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Level III neonatal intensive care units at three university children's hospitals. Patients: Ninety-six premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) randomly assigned to HFOV or IPPV within the first 2 hours of life. All patients received a natural surfactant. No differences were found between the study groups with respect to the demographic data or the severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were stratified at randomization, by birth weight, into two groups: 750 to 1000 gm (n = 32) and 1001 to 1500 gm (n = 64). The centers involved complied with a study protocol that planned a reduction in respiratory pressures when the infant's oxygen requirement had reached a fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.6. Results: Five patients in the HFOV group died, and eight patients did not respond to the randomized ventilation mode; whereas four patients in the IPPV group died, and nine were switched to HFOV. No differences were found in, gas exchange or ventilator support over the first 72 hours. Premature infants with a birth weight < 1000 gm had a significantly shorter course to reach fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.21 while receiving IPPV than those receiving HFOV (9.3 +/- 4.5 days vs 27.5 +/- 10.2 days, p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups in extraalveolar air (HFOV, seven; IPPV seven) and intracranial bleeding (HFOV, nine; IPPV, eight). Conclusion: After surfactant treatment, HFOV, as a primary ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, is as safe and efficacious as conventional ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PULMONARY MECHANICS IN PRETERM NEONATES WITH RESPIRATORY-FAILURE TREATED WITH HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION
    ABBASI, S
    BHUTANI, VK
    SPITZER, AR
    FOX, WW
    PEDIATRICS, 1991, 87 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [43] Elective High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Acute Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants
    Al Ethawi, Yahya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEONATOLOGY, 2012, 1 (03) : 121 - 123
  • [44] The prove multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: Improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome
    Gerstmann, DR
    Minton, SD
    Stoddard, RA
    Meredith, KS
    Monaco, F
    Bertrand, JM
    Battisti, O
    Langhendries, JP
    Francois, A
    Clark, RH
    PEDIATRICS, 1996, 98 (06) : 1044 - 1057
  • [45] RESULTS OF THE PROVO MULTICENTER SURFACTANT HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION CONTROLLED TRIAL
    GERSTMANN, DR
    MINTON, SD
    STODDARD, RA
    BERTRAND, JM
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1995, 37 (04) : A333 - A333
  • [46] Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis
    Filip Cools
    Lisa M Askie
    Martin Offringa
    BMC Pediatrics, 9
  • [47] COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION AND HIGH-FREQUENCY VENTILATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY-FAILURE
    HURST, JM
    BRANSON, RD
    DAVIS, K
    BARRETTE, RR
    ADAMS, KS
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 211 (04) : 486 - 491
  • [48] Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis
    Cools, Filip
    Askie, Lisa M.
    Offringa, Martin
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2009, 9
  • [49] An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation
    Erdeve, Omer
    Okulu, Emel
    Tunc, Gaffari
    Celik, Yalcin
    Kayacan, Ugur
    Cetinkaya, Merih
    Buyukkale, Gokhan
    Ozkan, Hilal
    Koksal, Nilgun
    Satar, Mehmet
    Akcali, Mustafa
    Aygun, Canan
    Ozkiraz, Servet
    Zubarioglu, Umut
    Unal, Sezin
    Turgut, Hatice
    Mert, Kurthan
    Gokmen, Tulin
    Akcan, Baris
    Atasay, Begum
    Arsan, Saadet
    Ozkan, Elif Ozyazici
    Uslu, Sinan
    Demirel, Nihal
    Gokce, Ismail Kursad
    Vardar, Gonca
    Turkmen, Munevver
    Konak, Murat
    Ozan, Beyza
    Kilicaslan, Buket
    Narli, Nejat
    Demir, Nihat
    Tuncer, Oguz
    Akin, Ilke Mungan
    Aslanoglu, Sertac
    Calkavur, Sebnem
    Olukman, Ozgur
    Bayraktar, Bilge Tanyeri
    Bilgin, Leyla
    Guran, Omer
    Aksu, Meltem
    Hirfanoglu, Ibrahim
    Ince, Deniz Anuk
    Ecevit, Ayse N.
    Narter, Fatma
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [50] High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled study
    El-Nawawy, Ahmed
    Moustafa, Azza
    Heshmat, Hassan
    Abouahmed, Ahmed
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 59 (02) : 130 - 143