A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant

被引:63
|
作者
Rettwitz-Volk, W
Veldman, A
Roth, B
Vierzig, A
Kachel, W
Varnholt, V
Schlösser, R
von Loewenich, V
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Pediat, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Pediat, Mannheim, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS | 1998年 / 132卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70440-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) as a primary ventilation mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Primary end points were survival and maintenance of the randomized ventilation mode. Study design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Level III neonatal intensive care units at three university children's hospitals. Patients: Ninety-six premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) randomly assigned to HFOV or IPPV within the first 2 hours of life. All patients received a natural surfactant. No differences were found between the study groups with respect to the demographic data or the severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were stratified at randomization, by birth weight, into two groups: 750 to 1000 gm (n = 32) and 1001 to 1500 gm (n = 64). The centers involved complied with a study protocol that planned a reduction in respiratory pressures when the infant's oxygen requirement had reached a fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.6. Results: Five patients in the HFOV group died, and eight patients did not respond to the randomized ventilation mode; whereas four patients in the IPPV group died, and nine were switched to HFOV. No differences were found in, gas exchange or ventilator support over the first 72 hours. Premature infants with a birth weight < 1000 gm had a significantly shorter course to reach fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.21 while receiving IPPV than those receiving HFOV (9.3 +/- 4.5 days vs 27.5 +/- 10.2 days, p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups in extraalveolar air (HFOV, seven; IPPV seven) and intracranial bleeding (HFOV, nine; IPPV, eight). Conclusion: After surfactant treatment, HFOV, as a primary ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, is as safe and efficacious as conventional ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Dincer Yildizdas
    Hacer Yapicioglu
    Ibrahim Bayram
    Levent Yilmaz
    Yasar Sertdemir
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2009, 76 : 921 - 927
  • [22] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of respiratory distress syndrome
    Moriette, G
    Brunhes, A
    Jarreau, PH
    BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE, 2000, 77 : 14 - 16
  • [23] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Yildizdas, Dincer
    Yapicioglu, Hacer
    Bayram, Ibrahim
    Yilmaz, Levent
    Sertdemir, Yasar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 76 (09): : 921 - 927
  • [24] Neuromotor outcome at 2 years of very preterm infants who were treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
    Truffert, Patrick
    Paris-Llado, Josefa
    Escande, Benoit
    Magny, Jean-Francois
    Cambonie, Gilles
    Saliba, Elie
    Thiriez, Gerard
    Zupan-Simunek, Veronique
    Blanc, Thierry
    Roze, Jean-Christophe
    Breart, Gerard
    Moriette, Guy
    PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (04) : E860 - E865
  • [25] Prospective Randomized Multicenter Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) and Conventional Ventilation (CV) in Preterm Infants <30 Weeks Gestational Age (GA) with RDS
    G Moriette
    H Walti
    B Salanave
    D Chognot
    J-F Magny
    G Cambonie
    J Y Pauchard
    S Cantagrel
    T Lacaze
    Laurent Storme
    T Blanc
    J-M Liet
    S Lebouedec
    O Claris
    J Paris-Llado
    G Breart
    Pediatric Research, 1999, 45 : 212 - 212
  • [26] A randomized prospective comparative trial of elective early high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in preterm infants with respiratory distress sydrome (RDS)
    Al-Alaiyan, S
    Salama, H
    Rejjal, A
    Katan, A
    Shoukri, M
    Al Mahmood, L
    Al Asmi, M
    Neily, E
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 56 (03) : 465 - 465
  • [27] Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Malakian, Arash
    Bashirnezhadkhabaz, Shiva
    Aramesh, Mohammad-Reza
    Dehdashtian, Masoud
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (15): : 2601 - 2607
  • [28] Randomized, multicenter trial of conventional ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the early management of respiratory failure in term or near-term infants in Colombia
    Rojas M.A.
    Lozano J.M.L.
    Rojas M.X.
    Bose C.L.
    Rondón M.A.
    Ruiz G.
    Piñeros J.G.
    Rojas C.
    Robayo G.
    Hoyos A.
    Celis L.A.
    Torres S.
    Correa J.
    Journal of Perinatology, 2005, 25 (11) : 720 - 724
  • [29] PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION AND CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN PEDIATRIC RESPIRATORY-FAILURE
    ARNOLD, JH
    HANSON, JH
    TOROFIGUERO, LO
    GUTIERREZ, J
    BERENS, RJ
    ANGLIN, DL
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (10) : 1530 - 1539
  • [30] Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and conventional ventilation (CV) in preterm infants &lt;30 weeks gestational age (GA) with RDS
    Moriette, G
    Walti, H
    Salanave, B
    Chognot, D
    Magny, JF
    Cambonie, G
    Pauchard, JY
    Cantagrel, S
    Lacaze, T
    Storme, L
    Blanc, T
    Liet, JM
    Lebouedec, S
    Claris, O
    Paris-Llado, J
    Breart, G
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 45 (04) : 212A - 212A