A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant

被引:63
|
作者
Rettwitz-Volk, W
Veldman, A
Roth, B
Vierzig, A
Kachel, W
Varnholt, V
Schlösser, R
von Loewenich, V
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Pediat, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Pediat, Mannheim, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS | 1998年 / 132卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70440-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) as a primary ventilation mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Primary end points were survival and maintenance of the randomized ventilation mode. Study design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Level III neonatal intensive care units at three university children's hospitals. Patients: Ninety-six premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) randomly assigned to HFOV or IPPV within the first 2 hours of life. All patients received a natural surfactant. No differences were found between the study groups with respect to the demographic data or the severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were stratified at randomization, by birth weight, into two groups: 750 to 1000 gm (n = 32) and 1001 to 1500 gm (n = 64). The centers involved complied with a study protocol that planned a reduction in respiratory pressures when the infant's oxygen requirement had reached a fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.6. Results: Five patients in the HFOV group died, and eight patients did not respond to the randomized ventilation mode; whereas four patients in the IPPV group died, and nine were switched to HFOV. No differences were found in, gas exchange or ventilator support over the first 72 hours. Premature infants with a birth weight < 1000 gm had a significantly shorter course to reach fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.21 while receiving IPPV than those receiving HFOV (9.3 +/- 4.5 days vs 27.5 +/- 10.2 days, p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups in extraalveolar air (HFOV, seven; IPPV seven) and intracranial bleeding (HFOV, nine; IPPV, eight). Conclusion: After surfactant treatment, HFOV, as a primary ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, is as safe and efficacious as conventional ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN PRETERM INFANTS WITH RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME
    RAMANATHAN, R
    RUIZ, I
    TANTIVIT, P
    CAVABVAB, R
    DELEMOS, R
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1995, 37 (04) : A347 - A347
  • [2] Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome
    Moriette, G
    Paris-Llado, J
    Walti, H
    Escande, B
    Magny, JF
    Cambonie, G
    Thiriez, G
    Cantagrel, S
    Lacaze-Masmonteil, T
    Storme, L
    Blanc, T
    Liet, JM
    André, C
    Salanave, B
    Bréart, G
    PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (02) : 363 - 372
  • [3] Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Infants with Moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
    Zhu, Xingwang
    Feng, Zhichun
    Liu, Chengjun
    Shi, Liping
    Shi, Yuan
    Ramanathan, Rangasamy
    NEONATOLOGY, 2021, : 325 - 331
  • [4] A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION IN PRETERM INFANTS WITH RESPIRATORY-FAILURE
    OGAWA, Y
    MIYASAKA, K
    KAWANO, T
    IMURA, S
    INUKAI, K
    OKUYAMA, K
    OGUCHI, K
    TOGARI, H
    NISHIDA, H
    MISHINA, J
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 32 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [5] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY AND CONVENTIONAL VENTILATION IN RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME
    CLARK, RH
    GERSTMANN, DR
    NULL, DM
    DELEMOS, RA
    PEDIATRICS, 1992, 89 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [6] HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN THE TREATMENT OF RESPIRATORY-FAILURE IN PRETERM INFANTS
    SINNETT, E
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (02): : 88 - 93
  • [7] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Sud, Sachin
    Sud, Maneesh
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    Wunsch, Hannah
    Meade, Maureen O.
    Ferguson, Niall D.
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (04):
  • [8] Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome and ARDS After Extubation A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chen, Long
    Wang, Li
    Ma, Juan
    Feng, Zhichun
    Li, Jie
    Shi, Yuan
    CHEST, 2019, 155 (04) : 740 - 748
  • [9] HIGH-FREQUENCY VENTILATION AND CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN NEWBORN BABIES WITH RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    PARDOU, A
    VERMEYLEN, D
    MULLER, MF
    DETEMMERMAN, D
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 19 (07) : 406 - 410
  • [10] PULMONARY-FUNCTION IN PRETERM INFANTS WITH RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME TREATED WITH HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION (HFOV) COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION (CMV)
    DURAND, M
    TANTIVIT, P
    RUIZ, I
    CAYABYAB, R
    RAMANATHAN, R
    DELEMOS, RA
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1995, 37 (04) : A204 - A204