Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Alzahrani, Meshal [1 ,2 ]
Broadbent, David A. [3 ]
Chuter, Robert [4 ,5 ]
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar [3 ]
Jackson, Steven [4 ]
Michael, Hutton [4 ]
Johnstone, Robert, I [6 ]
Shah, Simon [6 ]
Wetscherek, Andreas [7 ,8 ]
Chick, H. Joan [7 ,8 ]
Wyatt, Jonathan J. [9 ,10 ]
McCallum, Hazel Mhairi [9 ,10 ]
Speight, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Biomed Imaging Sci Dept, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn CMPE, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Canc Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[7] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London, England
[8] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[9] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Northern Ctr Canc Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[10] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Canc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Geometric distortion; Radiotherapy; Quality assurance; Audit; RADIATION-THERAPY; MRI; PRECISION; ACCURACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiotherapy (RT). However, geometric distortions are a known challenge of using MRI in RT. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of a national audit of MRI geometric distortions. This was achieved by assessing large field of view (FOV) MRI distortions on a number of scanners used clinically for RT. Materials and methods: MRI scans of a large FOV MRI geometric distortion phantom were acquired on 11 MRI scanners that are used clinically for RT in the UK. The mean and maximum distortions and variance between scanners were reported at different distances from the isocentre. Results: For a small FOV representing a brain (100-150 mm from isocentre) all distortions were < 2 mm except for the maximum distortion of one scanner. For a large FOV representing a head and neck/pelvis (200-250 mm from isocentre) mean distortions were < 2 mm except for one scanner, maximum distortions were > 10 mm in some cases. The variance between scanners was low and was found to increase with distance from isocentre. Conclusions: This study demonstrated feasibility of the technique to be repeated in a country wide geometric distortion audit of all MRI scanners used clinically for RT. Recommendations were made for performing such an audit and how to derive acceptable limits of distortion in such an audit.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the feasibility of cardiac substructure sparing in magnetic resonance imaging guided stereotactic lung radiotherapy
    van der Pol, Luuk H. G.
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Hoesein, Firdaus A. A. Mohamed
    Snoeren, Louk M. W.
    Pomp, Jacqueline
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
    Fast, Martin F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (01) : 397 - 409
  • [22] Distortion correction of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck in radiotherapy position
    Winter, Rene M.
    Schmidt, Holger
    Leibfarth, Sara
    Zwirner, Kerstin
    Welz, Stefan
    Schwenzer, Nina F.
    la Fougere, Christian
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (11) : 1659 - 1663
  • [23] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Distortion in Functional Neurosurgery
    Sankar, Tejas
    Lozano, Andres M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 75 (01) : 29 - 31
  • [24] A phantom based laser marking workflow to visually assess geometric image distortion in magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy
    Drobnitzky, Matthias
    vom Endt, Axel
    Dewdney, Andrew
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 95 - 99
  • [25] Impact Assessment of Systemic Geometric Distortion in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation through Three-dimensional Geometric Distortion Phantom on Dosimetric Accuracy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Prostate Treatment Planning
    Chaknam, Korawig
    Worapruekjaru, Ladawan
    Suphaphong, Sithiphong
    Stansook, Nualjun
    Sodkokkruad, Prapa
    Asavaphatiboon, Sawwanee
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 49 (03) : 356 - 362
  • [26] An audit of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anaesthesia
    Wilson, D
    Laurence, AS
    Bunting, P
    Keens, SJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) : 466P - 466P
  • [27] Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
    Kavaluus, Henna
    Nousiainen, Katri
    Kaijaluoto, Sampsa
    Seppala, Tiina
    Saarilahti, Kauko
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 58 - 64
  • [28] Design and construction of a customizable phantom for the characterization of the three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Hammoud, Rabih
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Arunachalam, Yoganathan
    Aouadi, Souha
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (12): : 149 - 157
  • [29] Feasibility of incorporating magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) in radiotherapy treatment planning of recurrent gliomas
    Ballangrud, A. M.
    Lyinberis, S.
    Thakur, S. B.
    Karimi, S.
    Huang, W.
    Abrey, L. E.
    Gutin, P. H.
    Chang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S67 - S67
  • [30] Diffusion-Sensitized Ophthalmic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Free of Geometric Distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T A Feasibility Study in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Intraocular Masses
    Paul, Katharina
    Graessl, Andreas
    Rieger, Jan
    Lysiak, Darius
    Huelnhagen, Till
    Winter, Lukas
    Heidemann, Robin
    Lindner, Tobias
    Hadlich, Stefan
    Zimpfer, Annette
    Pohlmann, Andreas
    Endemann, Beate
    Krueger, Paul-Christian
    Langner, Soenke
    Stachs, Oliver
    Niendorf, Thoralf
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (05) : 309 - 321