Portfolio decision analysis methods in environmental decision making

被引:28
|
作者
Lahtinen, Tuomas J. [1 ]
Hamalainen, Raimo P. [1 ]
Liesio, Juuso [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Syst Anal Lab, Dept Math & Syst Anal, POB 11100, Aalto 00076, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Dept Informat & Serv Econ, POB 21220, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
Portfolio; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Environmental decision making; Resource allocation; Problem structuring; Modern portfolio theory; OPERATIONAL-RESEARCH; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; PATH DEPENDENCE; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; BIASES; ALTERNATIVES; OPTIMIZATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.04.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Environmental modellers recurrently work with decisions where a portfolio of actions has to be formed to effectively address the overall situation at hand. When creating the portfolio, one needs to consider multiple objectives and constraints, identify promising action candidates and examine interactions among them. The area of portfolio decision analysis deals with such tasks. This paper reviews portfolio modelling approaches and software that are applicable in environmental management. A framework for environmental portfolio decision analysis is provided that consists of steps ranging from problem framing to modelling and optimization, as well as to the analysis of results. The use of this framework is demonstrated with an illustrative case describing planning of urban water services. The problem is analyzed with a recently introduced portfolio decision analysis method called Robust Portfolio Modelling, which enables the use of incomplete preference information and consequence data. This feature can be particularly useful in environmental applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on Capital Portfolio Decision Based on Fuzzy Decision-making Theory
    Yao, Lijuan
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCES, MODERN MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS (SSMME 2018), 2018, : 15 - 19
  • [32] Environmental sustainable decision making- The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis
    Dong, Yan
    Miraglia, Simona
    Manzo, Stefano
    Georgiadis, Stylianos
    Sorup, Hjalte Jomo Danielsen
    Boriani, Elena
    Hald, Tine
    Thons, Sebastian
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 87 : 33 - 44
  • [33] Comparative Analysis of Modern Decision-Making Methods
    Cugova, Aneta
    Kubala, Pavol
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 7386 - 7394
  • [34] Risk Analysis in Forecasting Methods for Financial Decision Making
    Viviana Giraldo-Arcila, Sindy
    Montoya-Ramirez, Diego
    Augusto Fernandez-Henao, Sergio
    VISION GERENCIAL, 2020, 19 (01): : 129 - 139
  • [35] Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The US evidence
    Patari, Eero
    Karell, Ville
    Luukka, Pasi
    Yeomans, Julian S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 265 (02) : 655 - 672
  • [36] HOW CAN HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT METHODS HELP DECISION MAKING IN PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT
    Akpo, H.
    Popa, C.
    Saka, O.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A616 - A617
  • [37] Environmental related decision making using the Interlink Decision Making Index (IDMI)
    School of Engineering and IT, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia
    不详
    Int. J. Environ. Waste Manage., 2008, 3 (257-266): : 257 - 266
  • [38] Analysis of the relation between multicriteria decision-making methods and human decision strategies
    Lehnhart, Eliete dos Reis
    Lobler, Mauri Leodir
    BOTTOM LINE, 2024,
  • [39] Will the hedonic pricing methods improve decision making in the sphere of environmental policies?
    Tosovská, E
    POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2004, 52 (02) : 283 - 286
  • [40] Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem
    Marttunen, Mika
    Haara, Arto
    Hjerppe, Turo
    Kurttila, Mikko
    Liesioe, Juuso
    Mustajoki, Jyri
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Tolvanen, Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 307 (02) : 842 - 859