Portfolio decision analysis methods in environmental decision making

被引:28
|
作者
Lahtinen, Tuomas J. [1 ]
Hamalainen, Raimo P. [1 ]
Liesio, Juuso [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Syst Anal Lab, Dept Math & Syst Anal, POB 11100, Aalto 00076, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Dept Informat & Serv Econ, POB 21220, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
Portfolio; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Environmental decision making; Resource allocation; Problem structuring; Modern portfolio theory; OPERATIONAL-RESEARCH; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; PATH DEPENDENCE; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; BIASES; ALTERNATIVES; OPTIMIZATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.04.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Environmental modellers recurrently work with decisions where a portfolio of actions has to be formed to effectively address the overall situation at hand. When creating the portfolio, one needs to consider multiple objectives and constraints, identify promising action candidates and examine interactions among them. The area of portfolio decision analysis deals with such tasks. This paper reviews portfolio modelling approaches and software that are applicable in environmental management. A framework for environmental portfolio decision analysis is provided that consists of steps ranging from problem framing to modelling and optimization, as well as to the analysis of results. The use of this framework is demonstrated with an illustrative case describing planning of urban water services. The problem is analyzed with a recently introduced portfolio decision analysis method called Robust Portfolio Modelling, which enables the use of incomplete preference information and consequence data. This feature can be particularly useful in environmental applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making
    Kiker, Gregory A.
    Bridges, Todd S.
    Varghese, Arun
    Seager, Thomas P.
    Linkov, Igor
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [2] Environmental policy analysis for decision making
    White, B
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (01) : 187 - 188
  • [3] Portfolio analysis and R&D decision making
    Evans, Richard
    Hinds, Scott
    Hammock, Denise
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (03) : 189 - 190
  • [4] Portfolio analysis and R&D decision making
    Richard Evans
    Scott Hinds
    Denise Hammock
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2009, 8 : 189 - 190
  • [5] COMPARISON OF DECISION MAKING METHODS WITH STATISTIC DECISION MAKING METHODS
    Hornicka, A.
    Svobodova, R.
    UCLIO 2010: UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE IN LIFE SCIENCES - PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 46 - 50
  • [6] Decision analysis and risk management decision making: Issues and methods
    Covello, V.T.
    1600, (07):
  • [7] A comparison of stochastic programming methods for portfolio level decision-making
    Graham, Emily
    Jaki, Thomas
    Harbron, Chris
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 30 (03) : 405 - 429
  • [8] Isoguarantees as instrument of portfolio decision making
    Rutkauskas, AV
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF BUSINESS SYSTEMS, 2003, : 239 - 243
  • [9] A MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING AT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
    Charouz, Jaroslav
    Ramik, Jaroslav
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2010, 13 (02): : 44 - 52
  • [10] Uses and Misuses of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Environmental Decision Making
    Steele, Katie
    Carmel, Yohay
    Cross, Jean
    Wilcox, Chris
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (01) : 26 - 33