Interval selection: Applications, algorithms, and lower bounds

被引:33
|
作者
Erlebach, T
Spieksma, FCR
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Appl Econ Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Comp Engn & Networks Lab, TIK, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
intervals; algorithms; approximation; lower bounds; independent set; APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; MULTIPLE MACHINES; SHORTEST PATHS; LINEAR-TIME; THROUGHPUT;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-6774(02)00291-2
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Given a set of jobs, each consisting of a number of weighted intervals on the real line, and a positive integer m, we study the problem of selecting a maximum weight subset of the intervals such that at most one interval is selected from each job and, for any point p on the real line, at most m intervals containing p are selected. We give a parameterized algorithm GREEDY(alpha) that belongs to the class of "myopic" algorithms, which are deterministic algorithms that process the given intervals in order of non-decreasing right endpoint and can either reject or select each interval (rejections are irrevocable). We show that there are values of the parameter alpha so that GREEDY(alpha) produces a 2-approximation in the case of unit weights, an 8-approximation in the case of arbitrary weights, and a (3 + 2root2) approximation in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. We also show that no deterministic myopic algorithm can achieve ratio better than 2 in the case of unit weights, better than approximate to7.103 in the case of arbitrary weights, and better than 3 + 2root2 in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. Furthermore, we give additional results for the case where all intervals have the same length as well as a lower bound of e/e - 1 approximate to 1.582 on the approximation ratio of randomized myopic algorithms in the case of unit weights. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 53
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Streaming Tournaments
    Ghosh, Prantar
    Kuchlous, Sahil
    Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, 308
  • [32] EXPONENTIAL LOWER BOUNDS ON A CLASS OF KNAPSACK ALGORITHMS
    HAUSMANN, D
    KANNAN, R
    KORTE, B
    MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1981, 6 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [33] Hexagonal grid drawings: Algorithms and lower bounds
    Aziza, S
    Biedl, T
    GRAPH DRAWING, 2004, 3383 : 18 - 24
  • [34] Lower bounds for the rate of convergence of greedy algorithms
    Livshits, E. D.
    IZVESTIYA MATHEMATICS, 2009, 73 (06) : 1197 - 1215
  • [35] New algorithms and lower bounds for monotonicity testing
    Chen, Xi
    Servedio, Rocco A.
    Tan, Li-Yang
    2014 55TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2014), 2014, : 286 - 295
  • [36] Lower Bounds and Accelerated Algorithms for Bilevel Optimization
    Ji, Kaiyi
    Liang, Yingbin
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2022, 23
  • [37] Flows on few paths: Algorithms and lower bounds
    Martens, M
    Skutella, M
    ALGORITHMS ESA 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3221 : 520 - 531
  • [38] PROVING RELATIVE LOWER BOUNDS FOR INCREMENTAL ALGORITHMS
    BERMAN, AM
    PAULL, MC
    RYDER, BG
    ACTA INFORMATICA, 1990, 27 (07) : 665 - 683
  • [39] Framing of Imprecise Quantities: When Are Lower Interval Bounds Preferred to Upper Bounds?
    Halberg, Anne-Marie
    Teigen, Karl Halvor
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2009, 22 (05) : 490 - 509
  • [40] Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees
    Danielson, Mats
    Ekenberg, Love
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (02) : 808 - 816