Interval selection: Applications, algorithms, and lower bounds

被引:33
|
作者
Erlebach, T
Spieksma, FCR
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Appl Econ Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Comp Engn & Networks Lab, TIK, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
intervals; algorithms; approximation; lower bounds; independent set; APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; MULTIPLE MACHINES; SHORTEST PATHS; LINEAR-TIME; THROUGHPUT;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-6774(02)00291-2
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Given a set of jobs, each consisting of a number of weighted intervals on the real line, and a positive integer m, we study the problem of selecting a maximum weight subset of the intervals such that at most one interval is selected from each job and, for any point p on the real line, at most m intervals containing p are selected. We give a parameterized algorithm GREEDY(alpha) that belongs to the class of "myopic" algorithms, which are deterministic algorithms that process the given intervals in order of non-decreasing right endpoint and can either reject or select each interval (rejections are irrevocable). We show that there are values of the parameter alpha so that GREEDY(alpha) produces a 2-approximation in the case of unit weights, an 8-approximation in the case of arbitrary weights, and a (3 + 2root2) approximation in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. We also show that no deterministic myopic algorithm can achieve ratio better than 2 in the case of unit weights, better than approximate to7.103 in the case of arbitrary weights, and better than 3 + 2root2 in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. Furthermore, we give additional results for the case where all intervals have the same length as well as a lower bound of e/e - 1 approximate to 1.582 on the approximation ratio of randomized myopic algorithms in the case of unit weights. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 53
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LOWER BOUNDS TO RANDOMIZED ALGORITHMS FOR GRAPH PROPERTIES
    YAO, ACC
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 1991, 42 (03) : 267 - 287
  • [22] Adversary lower bounds for nonadaptive quantum algorithms
    Koiran, Pascal
    Landes, Juergen
    Portier, Natacha
    Yao, Penghui
    LOGIC, LANGUAGE, INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 5110 : 226 - +
  • [23] Testing Graph Clusterability: Algorithms and Lower Bounds
    Chiplunkar, Ashish
    Kapralov, Michael
    Khanna, Sanjeev
    Mousavifar, Aida
    Peres, Yuval
    2018 IEEE 59TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS), 2018, : 497 - 508
  • [24] Lower Bounds and Faster Algorithms for Equality Constraints
    Jonsson, Peter
    Lagerkvist, Victor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, : 1784 - 1790
  • [25] Flows on few paths: Algorithms and lower bounds
    Martens, Maren
    Skutella, Martin
    NETWORKS, 2006, 48 (02) : 68 - 76
  • [26] Sketching Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Ridge Regression
    Kacham, Praneeth
    Woodruff, David P.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 162, 2022, : 10539 - 10556
  • [27] LOWER BOUNDS OF TIME COMPLEXITY OF SOME ALGORITHMS
    HONG, J
    SCIENTIA SINICA, 1979, 22 (08): : 890 - 900
  • [28] Adversary lower bounds for nonadaptive quantum algorithms
    Koiran, Pascal
    Landes, Juergen
    Portier, Natacha
    Yao, Penghui
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 76 (05) : 347 - 355
  • [29] ON LOWER BOUNDS OF TIME COMPLEXITY OF SOME ALGORITHMS
    洪加威
    Science China Mathematics, 1979, (08) : 890 - 900
  • [30] Quantum algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization
    Chakrabarti, Shouvanik
    Childs, Andrew M.
    Li, Tongyang
    Wu, Xiaodi
    QUANTUM, 2020, 4