Interval selection: Applications, algorithms, and lower bounds

被引:33
|
作者
Erlebach, T
Spieksma, FCR
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Appl Econ Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Comp Engn & Networks Lab, TIK, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
intervals; algorithms; approximation; lower bounds; independent set; APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; MULTIPLE MACHINES; SHORTEST PATHS; LINEAR-TIME; THROUGHPUT;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-6774(02)00291-2
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Given a set of jobs, each consisting of a number of weighted intervals on the real line, and a positive integer m, we study the problem of selecting a maximum weight subset of the intervals such that at most one interval is selected from each job and, for any point p on the real line, at most m intervals containing p are selected. We give a parameterized algorithm GREEDY(alpha) that belongs to the class of "myopic" algorithms, which are deterministic algorithms that process the given intervals in order of non-decreasing right endpoint and can either reject or select each interval (rejections are irrevocable). We show that there are values of the parameter alpha so that GREEDY(alpha) produces a 2-approximation in the case of unit weights, an 8-approximation in the case of arbitrary weights, and a (3 + 2root2) approximation in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. We also show that no deterministic myopic algorithm can achieve ratio better than 2 in the case of unit weights, better than approximate to7.103 in the case of arbitrary weights, and better than 3 + 2root2 in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. Furthermore, we give additional results for the case where all intervals have the same length as well as a lower bound of e/e - 1 approximate to 1.582 on the approximation ratio of randomized myopic algorithms in the case of unit weights. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 53
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower bounds for linear interval routing
    Eilam, T
    Moran, S
    Zaks, S
    NETWORKS, 1999, 34 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [2] DLP in semigroups: Algorithms and lower bounds
    Han, Jiao
    Zhuang, Jincheng
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CRYPTOLOGY, 2022, 16 (01) : 278 - 288
  • [3] Quantum query algorithms and lower bounds
    Ambainis, A
    Classical and New Paradigms of Computation and Their Complexity Hierarchies, 2004, 23 : 15 - 32
  • [4] Propositional lower bounds: Algorithms and complexity
    Cadoli, M
    Palopoli, L
    Scarcello, F
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 27 (1-4) : 129 - 148
  • [5] Lower complexity bounds for interpolation algorithms
    Gimenez, Nardo
    Heintz, Joos
    Matera, Guillermo
    Solerno, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF COMPLEXITY, 2011, 27 (02) : 151 - 187
  • [6] Propositional lower bounds: Generalization and algorithms
    Cadoli, M
    Palopoli, L
    Scarcello, F
    LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1998, 1489 : 355 - 367
  • [7] Lower bounds on generic algorithms in groups
    Maurer, U
    Wolf, S
    ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT '98, 1998, 1403 : 72 - 84
  • [8] LEARNING ALGORITHMS FROMCIRCUIT LOWER BOUNDS
    Pich, Jan
    COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2025, 34 (01)
  • [9] Propositional lower bounds: Algorithms and complexity
    Marco Cadoli
    Luigi Palopoli
    Francesco Scarcello
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 1999, 27 : 129 - 148
  • [10] General lower bounds for evolutionary algorithms
    Teytaud, Olivier
    Gelly, Sylvain
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN IX, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4193 : 21 - 31