An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network

被引:123
|
作者
Han, Z. Y. [1 ]
Weng, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Engn Phys, Ctr Publ Safety Res, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk analysis; Quantitative evaluation; Natural gas pipeline; Safety management; HIGH-PRESSURE PIPELINES; CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS; HAZARDOUS GAS; RELEASE RATE; DAMAGE; BUILDINGS; TRANSPORTATION; MODEL; HOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Natural gas industry is developing rapidly, and its accidents are threatening the urban safety. Risk management through quantitative assessment has become an important way to improve the safety performance of the natural gas supply system. In this paper, an integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network is proposed This method is composed of the probability assessment of accidents, the analysis of consequences and the evaluation of risk It is noteworthy that the consequences analyzed here include those of the outside and inside gas pipelines The analysis of consequences of the outside pipelines focuses on the individual risk and societal risk caused by different accidents, while those of the inside pipelines concerns about the risk of the economic loss because of the pressure re-distribution. Risk of a sample urban gas pipeline network is analyzed to demonstrate the presented method The results show that this presented integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network can be used in practical application Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier lid All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Analysis of the City Gas Pipeline Network Based on the Fault Tree
    Yin Yi-lin
    Lin Guang-li
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2477 - 2481
  • [42] Uncertainty Analysis for Natural Gas Transport Pipeline Network Layout: A New Methodology Based on Monte Carlo Method
    Zeng, Jun
    Sun, Chaoxu
    Zhu, Zhenjun
    Wu, Jiangling
    Chen, Hongsheng
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2018,
  • [43] Reliability assessment of integrated energy system considering the uncertainty of natural gas pipeline network system
    Yang, Hejun
    Zhang, Yeyu
    Ma, Yinghao
    Zhang, Dabo
    Sun, Lei
    Xia, Shiwei
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2019, 13 (22) : 5033 - 5041
  • [44] Consequences analysis of a natural gas pipeline: The case of the trans-Anatolian natural gas pipeline
    Cetinyokus, Saliha
    Dinc, Duran
    Ata, Sila
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (02) : 321 - 332
  • [45] Topology Analysis of Natural Gas Pipeline Networks Based on Complex Network Theory
    Ye, Heng
    Li, Zhiping
    Li, Guangyue
    Liu, Yiran
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (11)
  • [46] Research and application of gas pipeline safety planning based on quantitative risk analysis
    Chen, Ji-xin
    Wang, San-ming
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE 4TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NETWORKING, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (ITNEC 2020), 2020, : 240 - 246
  • [47] Risk Analysis of Burning and Explosion of Gas Pipeline Network Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network
    Chen J.
    Wu Y.
    Li Y.
    Qian X.
    Yuan M.
    Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021, 41 (07): : 696 - 705
  • [48] Quantitative Risk Analysis for Fire Accidents of Urban Gas Fuel Transmission Pipeline
    Liu, Fei
    Wang, Tong
    Lv, Lianghai
    Bai, Guang
    CHINESE PERSPECTIVE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2010, 13 : 285 - +
  • [49] The gas supply reliability analysis of natural gas pipeline network based on simplified topological structure
    Fan, Mu-Wei
    Gong, Jing
    Wu, Yang
    Kong, Wen-Hui
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2017, 9 (04)
  • [50] Quantitative risk analysis of pipeline gas (CO) leaking accidents and its uncertainty
    Zhang Yixian
    Zhang Yin
    Dong Xuefang
    Zhang Yu
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 6, PTS A AND B, 2006, 6 : 1315 - 1318