Recommendations for reporting statistical results when comparing proportions

被引:2
|
作者
Vrbin, Colleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Analyt Insights LLC, 4541 Bucktail Dr, Allison Pk, PA 15101 USA
关键词
chi-square test; confidence interval; effect size; Fisher's exact test; McNemar test; z test for proportions; CHI-SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; EFFECT SIZES; P VALUES; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/cyt.13083
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This article serves as the first in a series that will offer recommendations for optimal data reporting, specifically focusing on statistical methods most frequently reported by the Cytopathology audience. Recommendations for reporting statistical results when comparing proportions is the first topic in the series since comparing proportions, particularly utilising the chi-square test, was the most commonly reported inferential statistical test category over 2.5 years of Cytopathology articles.(1) While this article will provide a summary of common tests used to compare proportions, an extensive review of each method, including test assumptions and calculations, is beyond the scope of this summary. The author recommends consulting a trained statistician prior to data collection to discuss an analytical plan, including determining the appropriate statistical test(s) to use.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 304
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Statistical comparison of proportions - Reply
    Crystal, P
    Karakis, I
    Strano, S
    Koretz, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (01) : 260 - 260
  • [42] ... BUT IS THE OUTCOME MEANINGFUL? JNPT'S Recommendations for Reporting Results of Controlled Trials
    Harvey, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 35 (03): : 103 - 104
  • [43] Comparing Like with Like When Reporting Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Preterm Birth
    DeMauro, Sara B.
    Schmidt, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 197 : 10 - 12
  • [44] A statistical test and sample size recommendations for comparing community composition following PCA
    Skalski, John R.
    Richins, Shelby M.
    Townsend, Richard L.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [45] Reporting paternity testing results when 2 exclusions are encountered
    Balloch, K. J. D.
    Marshall, J.
    Clugston, J.
    Gow, J. W.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2008, 1 (01) : 492 - 493
  • [46] Common Mistakes to Avoid When Reporting Quantitative Analyses and Results
    Kovach, Christine R.
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2018, 11 (02) : 59 - 60
  • [47] Prioritizing GWAS Results: A Review of Statistical Methods and Recommendations for Their Application
    Cantor, Rita M.
    Lange, Kenneth
    Sinsheimer, Janet S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 86 (01) : 6 - 22
  • [48] Towards Better Estimation of Statistical Significance When Comparing Evolutionary Algorithms
    Buzdalov, Maxim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 1782 - 1788
  • [49] Preservice teachers' statistical reasoning when comparing groups facilitated by software
    Frischemeier, Daniel
    Biehler, Rolf
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME9), 2015, : 643 - 650
  • [50] Approaches to Statistical Efficiency When Comparing the Embedded Adaptive Interventions in a SMART
    Lycurgus, Timothy
    Kilbourne, Amy
    Almirall, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2024,