Recommendations for reporting statistical results when comparing proportions

被引:2
|
作者
Vrbin, Colleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Analyt Insights LLC, 4541 Bucktail Dr, Allison Pk, PA 15101 USA
关键词
chi-square test; confidence interval; effect size; Fisher's exact test; McNemar test; z test for proportions; CHI-SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; EFFECT SIZES; P VALUES; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/cyt.13083
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This article serves as the first in a series that will offer recommendations for optimal data reporting, specifically focusing on statistical methods most frequently reported by the Cytopathology audience. Recommendations for reporting statistical results when comparing proportions is the first topic in the series since comparing proportions, particularly utilising the chi-square test, was the most commonly reported inferential statistical test category over 2.5 years of Cytopathology articles.(1) While this article will provide a summary of common tests used to compare proportions, an extensive review of each method, including test assumptions and calculations, is beyond the scope of this summary. The author recommends consulting a trained statistician prior to data collection to discuss an analytical plan, including determining the appropriate statistical test(s) to use.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 304
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Statistical inference for proportions
    Joseph, L
    Reinhold, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 1057 - 1064
  • [22] Statistical comparison of proportions
    Halls, SB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (01) : 259 - 260
  • [24] Common Statistical Methods and Reporting of Results in Medical Research
    Feng, Guoshuang
    Qin, Guoyou
    Zhang, Tao
    Chen, Zheng
    Zhao, Yang
    CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 6 (03) : 117 - 125
  • [25] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE REPORTING OF PREOPERATIVE TESTING AND POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION
    BRACKMANN, DE
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1987, 97 (06) : 519 - 521
  • [26] Recommendations for the reporting of results from diagnostic next generation sequencing
    Vears, D. F.
    Senecal, K.
    Clarke, A. J.
    Yntema, H. G.
    Jackson, L.
    Lovrecic, L.
    Piton, A.
    Van Gassen, K. L. I.
    Knoppers, B. M.
    Borry, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 50 - 50
  • [27] Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing
    Streiner, David L.
    Kottner, Jan
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2014, 70 (09) : 1970 - 1979
  • [28] Sample calculations for comparing proportions
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 141 (05) : 666 - 667
  • [29] Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Papadopoulos, Moschos A.
    Athanasiou, Athanasios E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (01) : 74 - 85
  • [30] COMPARING PERFORMANCE RESULTS USING NEWFM AND STATISTICAL METHOD
    Lee, Sang-Hong
    Shin, Dong-Kun
    Lim, Joon S.
    ICSOFT 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND DATA TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2, 2009, : 353 - +