Multiphase flow and mixing quantification using computational fluid dynamics and magnetic resonance imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Maru, Wessenu [1 ]
Holland, Daniel [2 ]
Lakshmanan, Susithra [1 ]
Sederman, Andy [3 ]
Thomas, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Oil & Gas Measurement OGM Ltd, Ely, Cambs, England
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, Cambridge, England
基金
“创新英国”项目; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Multiphase flow; Custody transfer; MRI; CFD; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; LIQUID-LIQUID; BUBBLY FLOW; WATER; VELOCITY; JETS; MRI; TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101816
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the current challenges and practices of quality measurement in the oil & gas industry. It particularly focuses on automatic pipeline sampling of petroleum liquids according to ISO 3171. The problem is tackled using innovative diagnostic techniques, advanced design optimisation tools and a new mixing system that uses a Liquid Jet In Cross Flow (LJICF) configuration. First, a 2.5 '' diameter small multiphase flow loop (SMPFL) was developed and magnetic resonance (MR) was utilised to characterise the mechanistic behaviour of mixing and the mixing efficiency of various nozzles. Second, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed and validated using MR measurements on the SMPFL. The CFD model was then used to optimise the nozzle design as well as the design of a 10 '' nominal diameter large multiphase flow loop (LMPFL). The LMPFL is a well instrumented facility and was used to conduct mixing experiments on low velocity, low density and low viscosity fluids flowing in a horizontal pipe, which constitute challenging conditions for a mixing device to create homogeneous mixture. To quantify the homogeneity of the mixture created by the new mixing system on the LMPFL, a multiport profile proving (MPP) technique was developed and used to conduct water injection testing in compliance with ISO 3171 and API 8.2 standards. The water volume fraction (WVF) determined by the MPP had low relative error when compared to the mean WVF measured by the water cut meters and samples analysed using Coulometric Karl-Fischer (KF). Additionally, in an earlier study [1], the MPP measurement was able to detect a density gradient across the diameter of the pipe, making it an appropriate method to judge the homogeneity of the mixture. Therefore, the new mixing system together with the MPP technology shows real promise as an effective sampling and proving system for the petrochemical industry.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying uncertainty quantification to multiphase flow computational fluid dynamics
    Gel, A.
    Garg, R.
    Tong, C.
    Shahnam, M.
    Guenther, C.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 242 : 27 - 39
  • [2] Vortex shedding observations using magnetic resonance imaging, flow visualisation and computational fluid dynamics
    Noguchi, Y
    Marzouqa, I
    Hose, DR
    Paley, MNJ
    Wilkinson, ID
    Fenner, JW
    Griffiths, PD
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS IX, 1999, : 223 - 230
  • [3] Multiphase mixing quantification by computational homology and imaging analysis
    Xu, Jianxin
    Wang, Hua
    Fang, Hui
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (05) : 2160 - 2171
  • [4] Quantification of Particle Residence Time in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Ga-Young Suh
    Andrea S. Les
    Adam S. Tenforde
    Shawn C. Shadden
    Ryan L. Spilker
    Janice J. Yeung
    Christopher P. Cheng
    Robert J. Herfkens
    Ronald L. Dalman
    Charles A. Taylor
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 39 : 864 - 883
  • [5] Quantification of Particle Residence Time in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Suh, Ga-Young
    Les, Andrea S.
    Tenforde, Adam S.
    Shadden, Shawn C.
    Spilker, Ryan L.
    Yeung, Janice J.
    Cheng, Christopher P.
    Herfkens, Robert J.
    Dalman, Ronald L.
    Taylor, Charles A.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 39 (02) : 864 - 883
  • [6] Enhancing magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics
    Annio, Giacomo
    Torii, Ryo
    Ariff, Ben
    O'Regan, Declan P.
    Muthurangu, Vivek
    Ducci, Andrea
    Tsang, Victor
    Burriesci, Gaetano
    Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy, 2019, 2 (04)
  • [7] OPTIMIZATION OF A CYCLONE USING MULTIPHASE FLOW COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
    Weber, Justin
    Fullmer, William
    Gel, Aytekin
    Musser, Jordan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME/JSME/KSME JOINT FLUIDS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 2, 2019,
  • [8] Optimization of a Cyclone Using Multiphase Flow Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Weber, Justin
    Fullmer, William
    Gel, Aytekin
    Musser, Jordan
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2020, 142 (03):
  • [9] Resting myocardial blood flow quantification using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of stenosis: A computational fluid dynamics study
    Sommer, Karsten
    Bernat, Dominik
    Schmidt, Regine
    Breit, Hanns-Christian
    Schreiber, Laura M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (07) : 4375 - 4384
  • [10] Quantification of Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms During Rest and Exercise Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Andrea S. Les
    Shawn C. Shadden
    C. Alberto Figueroa
    Jinha M. Park
    Maureen M. Tedesco
    Robert J. Herfkens
    Ronald L. Dalman
    Charles A. Taylor
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 38 : 1288 - 1313