Applying uncertainty quantification to multiphase flow computational fluid dynamics

被引:42
|
作者
Gel, A. [1 ,2 ]
Garg, R. [1 ,3 ]
Tong, C. [4 ]
Shahnam, M. [1 ]
Guenther, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[2] ALPEMI Consulting LLC, Phoenix, AZ 85044 USA
[3] UPS Energy & Construct Inc, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[4] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, CASC, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
关键词
Multiphase flow; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Non-intrusive parametric uncertainty quantification and propagation; Surrogate models; Data-fitted response surface; VALIDATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.045
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Multiphase computational fluid dynamics plays a major role in design and optimization of fossil fuel based reactors. There is a growing interest in accounting for the influence of uncertainties associated with physical systems to increase the reliability of computational simulation based engineering analysis. The U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology laboratory (NETL) has recently undertaken an initiative to characterize uncertainties associated with computer simulation of reacting multiphase flows encountered in energy producing systems such as a coal gasifier. The current work presents the preliminary results in applying non-intrusive parametric uncertainty quantification and propagation techniques with NETL's open-source multiphase computational fluid dynamics software MFIX For this purpose an open-source uncertainty quantification toolkit, PSUADE developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has been interfaced with MFIX software. In this study, the sources of uncertainty associated with numerical approximation and model form have been neglected, and only the model input parametric uncertainty with forward propagation has been investigated by constructing a surrogate model based on data-fitted response surface for a multiphase flow demonstration problem. Monte Carlo simulation was employed for forward propagation of the aleatory type input uncertainties. Several insights gained based on the outcome of these simulations are presented such as how inadequate characterization of uncertainties can affect the reliability of the prediction results. Also a global sensitivity study using Sobol' indices was performed to better understand the contribution of input parameters to the variability observed in response variable. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 39
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation and Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Model
    Gel, Aytekin
    Li, Tingwen
    Gopalan, Balaji
    Shahnam, Mehrdad
    Syamlal, Madhava
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (33) : 11424 - 11435
  • [2] Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics
    Roache, PJ
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1997, 29 : 123 - 160
  • [3] Uncertainty quantification for chaotic computational fluid dynamics
    Yu, Y.
    Zhao, M.
    Lee, T.
    Pestieau, N.
    Bo, W.
    Glimm, J.
    Grove, J. W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 217 (01) : 200 - 216
  • [4] Multiphase flow and mixing quantification using computational fluid dynamics and magnetic resonance imaging
    Maru, Wessenu
    Holland, Daniel
    Lakshmanan, Susithra
    Sederman, Andy
    Thomas, Andrew
    FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2021, 77
  • [5] Uncertainty Quantification for Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Closure Relations with a Physics-Informed Bayesian Approach
    Liu, Yang
    Dinh, Nam
    Sun, Xiaodong
    Hu, Rui
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 209 (12) : 2002 - 2015
  • [6] Quantification of numerical uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics modelling of hydrocyclones
    Karimi, M.
    Akdogan, G.
    Dellimore, K. H.
    Bradshaw, S. M.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 : 45 - 54
  • [7] Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Najm, Habib N.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 41 : 35 - 52
  • [8] Special Issue: Uncertainty Quantification Computational Fluid Dynamics Preface
    Zang, Thomas A.
    Poroseva, Svetlana
    THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2012, 26 (05) : 401 - 401
  • [9] OPTIMIZATION OF A CYCLONE USING MULTIPHASE FLOW COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
    Weber, Justin
    Fullmer, William
    Gel, Aytekin
    Musser, Jordan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME/JSME/KSME JOINT FLUIDS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 2, 2019,
  • [10] Application of computational fluid dynamics to multiphase flow in Bubble Columns
    Bertola, Francesco
    Vanni, Marco
    Baldi, Giancarlo
    International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2002, 1 (01)