Multiphase flow and mixing quantification using computational fluid dynamics and magnetic resonance imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Maru, Wessenu [1 ]
Holland, Daniel [2 ]
Lakshmanan, Susithra [1 ]
Sederman, Andy [3 ]
Thomas, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Oil & Gas Measurement OGM Ltd, Ely, Cambs, England
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, Cambridge, England
基金
“创新英国”项目; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Multiphase flow; Custody transfer; MRI; CFD; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; LIQUID-LIQUID; BUBBLY FLOW; WATER; VELOCITY; JETS; MRI; TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101816
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the current challenges and practices of quality measurement in the oil & gas industry. It particularly focuses on automatic pipeline sampling of petroleum liquids according to ISO 3171. The problem is tackled using innovative diagnostic techniques, advanced design optimisation tools and a new mixing system that uses a Liquid Jet In Cross Flow (LJICF) configuration. First, a 2.5 '' diameter small multiphase flow loop (SMPFL) was developed and magnetic resonance (MR) was utilised to characterise the mechanistic behaviour of mixing and the mixing efficiency of various nozzles. Second, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed and validated using MR measurements on the SMPFL. The CFD model was then used to optimise the nozzle design as well as the design of a 10 '' nominal diameter large multiphase flow loop (LMPFL). The LMPFL is a well instrumented facility and was used to conduct mixing experiments on low velocity, low density and low viscosity fluids flowing in a horizontal pipe, which constitute challenging conditions for a mixing device to create homogeneous mixture. To quantify the homogeneity of the mixture created by the new mixing system on the LMPFL, a multiport profile proving (MPP) technique was developed and used to conduct water injection testing in compliance with ISO 3171 and API 8.2 standards. The water volume fraction (WVF) determined by the MPP had low relative error when compared to the mean WVF measured by the water cut meters and samples analysed using Coulometric Karl-Fischer (KF). Additionally, in an earlier study [1], the MPP measurement was able to detect a density gradient across the diameter of the pipe, making it an appropriate method to judge the homogeneity of the mixture. Therefore, the new mixing system together with the MPP technology shows real promise as an effective sampling and proving system for the petrochemical industry.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The History of Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Lyczkowski, Robert W.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (11) : 5029 - 5036
  • [32] Methods for multiphase computational fluid dynamics
    van Wachem, BGM
    Almstedt, AE
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 96 (1-3) : 81 - 98
  • [33] Progress in multiphase computational fluid dynamics
    Lahey, Richard T., Jr.
    Baglietto, Emilio
    Bolotnov, Igor A.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2021, 374
  • [34] Hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics
    Zhao, Xuemei
    Li, Rui
    Chen, Yu
    Sia, Sheau Fung
    Li, Donghai
    Zhang, Yu
    Liu, Aihua
    ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2017, 33 (02) : 472 - 483
  • [35] High resolution hemodynamic profiling of murine arteriovenous fistula using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics
    Pike, Daniel
    Shiu, Yan-Ting
    Somarathna, Maheshika
    Guo, Lingling
    Isayeva, Tatyana
    Totenhagen, John
    Lee, Timmy
    THEORETICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICAL MODELLING, 2017, 14
  • [36] Hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics
    Xuemei Zhao
    Rui Li
    Yu Chen
    Sheau Fung Sia
    Donghai Li
    Yu Zhang
    Aihua Liu
    Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2017, 33 : 472 - 483
  • [37] Using 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Case Study
    Biglino, Giovanni
    Cosentino, Daria
    Steeden, Jennifer A.
    De Nova, Lorenzo
    Castelli, Matteo
    Ntsinjana, Hopewell
    Pennati, Giancarlo
    Taylor, Andrew M.
    Schievano, Silvia
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 3
  • [38] Hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics
    Xuemei Zhao
    Rui Li
    Yu Chen
    Sheau Fung Sia
    Donghai Li
    Yu Zhang
    Aihua Liu
    Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2017, 33 (02) : 472 - 483
  • [39] Prediction of Separation Length of Turbulent Multiphase Flow Using Radiotracer and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation
    Sugiharto, S.
    Kurniadi, R.
    Abidin, Z.
    Stegowski, Z.
    Furman, L.
    ATOM INDONESIA, 2013, 39 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [40] USING EXPERIMENTAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS FOR EVALUATING PERIODIC MIXING
    Bamberger, Judith Ann
    Pease, Leonard F.
    Recknagle, Kurtis P.
    Enderlin, Carl W.
    Minette, Michael J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 7, 2019,