Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing

被引:12
|
作者
Schiedat, Fabian [1 ]
Schoene, Dominik [1 ]
Aweimer, Assem [1 ]
Boesche, Leif [1 ]
Ewers, Aydan [1 ]
Gotzmann, Michael [2 ]
Patsalis, Polykarpos C. [1 ]
Muegge, Andreas [1 ]
Kloppe, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ, Univ Hosp Bergmannsheil Bochum, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ, St Josef Hosp Bochum, Dept Cardiol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Cardiac resynchronization therapy response; Left ventricular reverse remodeling; Multipoint pacing; CRT optimization; ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; HEART-FAILURE; CLINICAL-RESPONSE; ESC GUIDELINES; OPTIMIZATION; PREVENTION; GERMANY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Multipoint pacing [Multipoint (TM) Pacing (MPP), Abbott] via a single left ventricular lead (Quartet (TM) LV lead, Abbott) improves acute left ventricular (LV) function and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Aim of this study was to examine additional benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and CRT response by activating MPP in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing (CONV). Methods 43 consecutive patients receiving CRT (Quadra Assura MP (TM), Abbott) received LV dP/dt(max) optimized CONV programming for 6 months. MPP programming with large anatomical electrode separation (> 30 mm) and basal LV1 pacing location was activated afterwards. Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were obtained at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up (FU). The response was defined as an improvement of LVESV >= 15% and super-response as improvement >= 30% relative to baseline. Results 41 patients completed FU (one died of non-cardiac cause and one was lost to FU) and after 6 months CONV, 26 patients (63%) were classified as CRT responders. With MPP, the response rate increased to 90% (p < 0.001). Super-response also improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (71% vs. 22%; p < 0.005). LV reverse remodeling in terms of LVESV improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (79 +/- 45 ml vs. 103 +/- 64 ml; p < 0.001). NYHA-class only improved significantly with CONV relative to baseline (1,8 +/- 0,7 vs. 2,7 +/- 0,5; p < 0.001), but not further with MPP (1,7 +/- 0,6 vs. 1,8 +/- 0,7; p = 0.49). Conclusion Multipoint pacing significantly improves response and super-response to CRT as well as LV reverse remodeling compared to conventional biventricular pacing. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 193
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Haemodynamic evaluation of alternative left ventricular endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    B.M. van Gelder
    R. Nathoe
    F.A. Bracke
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2016, 24 : 85 - 92
  • [22] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [23] Evaluation of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate over biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Miyazaki, Yuichiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Oka, Satoshi
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Shimamoto, Keiko
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [24] Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: what about the non-responders?
    Maria Ines Barradas Da Silva, M.
    Duarte, F.
    Coutinho Dos Santos, I.
    Resendes De Oliveira, L.
    Serena, C.
    Fontes, A.
    Viveiros Monteiro, A.
    Machado, C.
    Dourado, R.
    Santos, E.
    Pelicano, N.
    Pacheco, M.
    Tavares, A.
    Martins, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2022, 24 : 8 - 8
  • [25] The problem of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: who are non-responders?
    Soldatova, A. M.
    Kuznetsov, V. A.
    Dyachkov, S. M.
    Enina, T. N.
    Krinochkin, D. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 76 - 76
  • [26] Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Coppola, Giuseppe
    Ciaramitaro, Gianfranco
    Stabile, Giuseppe
    DOnofrio, Antonio
    Palmisano, Pietro
    Carita, Patrizia
    Mascioli, Giosue
    Pecora, Domenico
    De Simone, Antonio
    Marini, Massimiliano
    Rapacciuolo, Antonio
    Savarese, Gianluca
    Maglia, Giampiero
    Pepi, Patrizia
    Padeletti, Luigi
    Pierantozzi, Attilio
    Arena, Giuseppe
    Giovannini, Tiziana
    Caico, Salvatore Ivan
    Nugara, Cinzia
    Ajello, Laura
    Malacrida, Maurizio
    Corrado, Egle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 221 : 450 - 455
  • [27] Further reverse ventricular remodeling by dual-site left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Gadler, Fredrik
    Kranig, Wolfgang
    Ellery, Sue
    Gras, Daniel
    Lazarus, Arnaud
    Clementy, Jacques
    Daubert, Claude
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 719 - 719
  • [28] Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site
    Zanon, Francesco
    Baracca, Enrico
    Pastore, Gianni
    Marcantoni, Lina
    Fraccaro, Chiara
    Lanza, Daniela
    Picariello, Claudio
    Aggio, Silvio
    Roncon, Loris
    Dell'Avvocata, Fabio
    Rigatelli, GianLuca
    Pacetta, Domenico
    Noventa, Franco
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2015, 12 (05) : 975 - 981
  • [29] Cardiac memory in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A vectorcardiographic comparison of biventricular and left ventricular pacing
    Perrotta, Laura
    Ricciardi, Giuseppe
    Pieragnoli, Paolo
    Nesti, Martina
    Pontecorboli, Giulia
    Fantini, Fabio
    Padeletti, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (04) : 571 - 577
  • [30] Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing
    Varma, Niraj
    Baker, James, II
    Tomassoni, Gery
    Love, Charles J.
    Martin, David
    Sheppard, Robert
    Niazi, Imran
    Cranke, Gary
    Lee, Kwangdeok
    Corbisiero, Raffaele
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 13 (11): : E008680