Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing

被引:12
|
作者
Schiedat, Fabian [1 ]
Schoene, Dominik [1 ]
Aweimer, Assem [1 ]
Boesche, Leif [1 ]
Ewers, Aydan [1 ]
Gotzmann, Michael [2 ]
Patsalis, Polykarpos C. [1 ]
Muegge, Andreas [1 ]
Kloppe, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ, Univ Hosp Bergmannsheil Bochum, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ, St Josef Hosp Bochum, Dept Cardiol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Cardiac resynchronization therapy response; Left ventricular reverse remodeling; Multipoint pacing; CRT optimization; ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; HEART-FAILURE; CLINICAL-RESPONSE; ESC GUIDELINES; OPTIMIZATION; PREVENTION; GERMANY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Multipoint pacing [Multipoint (TM) Pacing (MPP), Abbott] via a single left ventricular lead (Quartet (TM) LV lead, Abbott) improves acute left ventricular (LV) function and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Aim of this study was to examine additional benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and CRT response by activating MPP in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing (CONV). Methods 43 consecutive patients receiving CRT (Quadra Assura MP (TM), Abbott) received LV dP/dt(max) optimized CONV programming for 6 months. MPP programming with large anatomical electrode separation (> 30 mm) and basal LV1 pacing location was activated afterwards. Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were obtained at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up (FU). The response was defined as an improvement of LVESV >= 15% and super-response as improvement >= 30% relative to baseline. Results 41 patients completed FU (one died of non-cardiac cause and one was lost to FU) and after 6 months CONV, 26 patients (63%) were classified as CRT responders. With MPP, the response rate increased to 90% (p < 0.001). Super-response also improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (71% vs. 22%; p < 0.005). LV reverse remodeling in terms of LVESV improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (79 +/- 45 ml vs. 103 +/- 64 ml; p < 0.001). NYHA-class only improved significantly with CONV relative to baseline (1,8 +/- 0,7 vs. 2,7 +/- 0,5; p < 0.001), but not further with MPP (1,7 +/- 0,6 vs. 1,8 +/- 0,7; p = 0.49). Conclusion Multipoint pacing significantly improves response and super-response to CRT as well as LV reverse remodeling compared to conventional biventricular pacing. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 193
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTI-SITE PACING IN INITIAL NON-RESPONDERS TO CONVENTIONAL CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
    Saba, Samir F.
    Nair, Devi G.
    Ellis, Chris-Topher R.
    Ciuffo, Allen A.
    Cox, Marilyn M.
    Gupta, Nigel
    Sharma, Saumya
    Jain, Sandeep K.
    Winner, Marshall W.
    Mehta, Sharda N.
    Simon, Torri
    Stein, Kenneth M.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (09) : 1629 - 1630
  • [12] Non-responders and biventricular stimulation: impact of alternative left and right-ventricular pacing sites
    van Campen, L
    Visser, FC
    De Cock, CC
    Vos, HS
    Visser, CA
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 395 - 395
  • [13] Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study
    Biffi, Mauro
    Defaye, Pascal
    Jais, Pierre
    Ruffa, Franco
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Gras, Daniel
    Yang, Zhongping
    Gerritse, Bart
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Morgan, John M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 259 : 88 - 93
  • [14] Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Feng
    Zheng, Lihui
    Ding, Ligang
    Du, Zhongpeng
    Liang, Erpeng
    Wu, Lingmin
    Chen, Gang
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Yao, Yan
    Jiang, Yu
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2018, 23 (06) : 927 - 934
  • [15] Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng Hu
    Lihui Zheng
    Ligang Ding
    Zhongpeng Du
    Erpeng Liang
    Lingmin Wu
    Gang Chen
    Xiaohan Fan
    Yan Yao
    Yu Jiang
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2018, 23 : 927 - 934
  • [16] Correction of mitral regurgitation by mitraclip in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy improves symptoms and promotes reverse remodeling
    Auricchio, A.
    Schillinger, W.
    Meyer, S.
    Maisano, F.
    Hoffmann, R.
    Ussia, G. P.
    Pedrazzini, G. B.
    Van der Heyden, J.
    Fratini, S.
    Franzen, O.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 499 - 499
  • [17] Characteristics of "True" Responders With Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Wakayama, Yuji
    Kondo, Masateru
    Yamaguchi, Nobuhiro
    Hirose, Masanori
    Fukuda, Koji
    Shimokawa, Hiroaki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2009, 15 (07) : S165 - S165
  • [18] The Relationship of Percent Biventricular Pacing to Ventricular Arrhythmias and Reverse Remodeling Post Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Rajabali, Alefiyah
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Vegh, Eszter M.
    Parks, Kimberly A.
    Moore, Stephanie A.
    Orencole, Mary
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Heist, Edwin K.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [19] Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kusiak, Aleksander
    Wilinski, Jerzy
    Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Sondej, Tomasz
    Kloch-Badelek, Malgorzata
    Czarnecka, Danuta M.
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 11 (04) : 736 - 742
  • [20] Haemodynamic evaluation of alternative left ventricular endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    van Gelder, B. M.
    Nathoe, R.
    Bracke, F. A.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 24 (01) : 85 - 92