Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study

被引:230
|
作者
Siche, Raul [1 ]
Pereira, Lucas [2 ]
Agostinho, Feni [2 ]
Ortega, Enrique [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Trujillo, Fac Ciencias Agropecuarias, Escuela Ingn Agroind, Trujillo, Peru
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Food Eng Sch, Ecol Engn Lab, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Emergy analysis; Ecological footprint; Sustainability indicators; Peru; NATIONS; EXERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In the last decade, two scientific tools have been extensively used worldwide to measure the human impact on nature: ecological footprint (EF) and emergy analysis (EA). Papers trying to combine the strong points of EF and EA, and obtain more accurate results have appeared in scientific literature, in which Zhao's et al. (2005) [61] approach is an important one. Unfortunately, some weak points of the original methods still remain on the new approaches proposed. The aim of this present work is to discuss some weak points found in Zhao's approach, trying to overcome them through a new approach called emergetic ecological footprint (EEF). The main difference between Zhao's approach and EEF is that the last one accounted for the internal storage of capital natural in the biocapacity calculation. Besides that, soil loss and water for human consume were considered as additional categories in the footprint calculation. After discussing it through comparisons with other approaches, EEF was used to assess Peru as a case study, resulting in a biocapacity of 51.76 gha capita(-1) and a footprint of 12.23 gha capita(-1), with 2004 data; that resulted in an ecological surplus of 39.53 gha capita(-1). The load capacity factor obtained was 4.23, meaning that Peru can support a population 4.23 times bigger considering the life style of 2004. The main limitations of the EEF are: (i) it is impossible to make comparisons between the biocapacity and footprint for each category; (ii) a need for a handbook with emergy intensity factors with good quality. On the other hand, the main positive points are: (i) its easiness of application in global and national scales; (ii) its final indicators account for all the previous energy (or emergy) used to make something; (iii) internal natural capital storage was accounted for in the biocapacity calculation, which can be a valid step towards the evaluation and assess of services provided by nature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3182 / 3192
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POSSIBILITIES OF ECONOMETRIC MODELING OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT. CASE STUDY: EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Ghita, Simona
    Boboc, Cristina
    BASIQ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: NEW TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS AND CONSUMPTION 2018, 2018, : 482 - 489
  • [42] The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries
    Nattapan Kongbuamai
    Quocviet Bui
    Hafiz Muhammad Abaid Ullah Yousaf
    Yun Liu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 19251 - 19264
  • [43] The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries
    Kongbuamai, Nattapan
    Bui, Quocviet
    Yousaf, Hafiz Muhammad Abaid Ullah
    Liu, Yun
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (16) : 19251 - 19264
  • [44] Sustainability and efficiency of water-land-energy-food nexus based on emergy-ecological footprint and data envelopment analysis: Case of an important agriculture and ecological region in Northeast China
    Yao, Xiaochen
    Chen, Weiwei
    Song, Changchun
    Gao, Siqi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [45] Assessing Environmental Sustainability Based on the Three-Dimensional Emergy Ecological Footprint (3D EEF) Model: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China
    Liu, Hua
    Lin, Xiaofen
    Wei, Jinhuan
    Hu, Lei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [46] Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability
    Gössling, S
    Hansson, CB
    Hörstmeier, O
    Saggel, S
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (2-3) : 199 - 211
  • [47] INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABILITY - ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS OF THE ARAD COUNTY
    Tigan, E.
    Brinzan, O.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 13 (2A): : 1019 - 1024
  • [48] Convergence in CO2emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: evidence from OECD countries
    Sakiru Adebola Solarin
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 6167 - 6181
  • [49] Convergence in CO2emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: evidence from OECD countries
    Solarin, Sakiru Adebola
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (06) : 6167 - 6181
  • [50] Convergence analysis of ecological footprint at different time scales: Evidence from Southern Common Market countries
    Ursavas, Ugur
    Yilanci, Veli
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (02) : 429 - 442