Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study

被引:230
|
作者
Siche, Raul [1 ]
Pereira, Lucas [2 ]
Agostinho, Feni [2 ]
Ortega, Enrique [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Trujillo, Fac Ciencias Agropecuarias, Escuela Ingn Agroind, Trujillo, Peru
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Food Eng Sch, Ecol Engn Lab, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Emergy analysis; Ecological footprint; Sustainability indicators; Peru; NATIONS; EXERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In the last decade, two scientific tools have been extensively used worldwide to measure the human impact on nature: ecological footprint (EF) and emergy analysis (EA). Papers trying to combine the strong points of EF and EA, and obtain more accurate results have appeared in scientific literature, in which Zhao's et al. (2005) [61] approach is an important one. Unfortunately, some weak points of the original methods still remain on the new approaches proposed. The aim of this present work is to discuss some weak points found in Zhao's approach, trying to overcome them through a new approach called emergetic ecological footprint (EEF). The main difference between Zhao's approach and EEF is that the last one accounted for the internal storage of capital natural in the biocapacity calculation. Besides that, soil loss and water for human consume were considered as additional categories in the footprint calculation. After discussing it through comparisons with other approaches, EEF was used to assess Peru as a case study, resulting in a biocapacity of 51.76 gha capita(-1) and a footprint of 12.23 gha capita(-1), with 2004 data; that resulted in an ecological surplus of 39.53 gha capita(-1). The load capacity factor obtained was 4.23, meaning that Peru can support a population 4.23 times bigger considering the life style of 2004. The main limitations of the EEF are: (i) it is impossible to make comparisons between the biocapacity and footprint for each category; (ii) a need for a handbook with emergy intensity factors with good quality. On the other hand, the main positive points are: (i) its easiness of application in global and national scales; (ii) its final indicators account for all the previous energy (or emergy) used to make something; (iii) internal natural capital storage was accounted for in the biocapacity calculation, which can be a valid step towards the evaluation and assess of services provided by nature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3182 / 3192
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emergy-based ecological footprint analysis of a wind farm in China
    Zhang, Xiaoqin
    Xu, Ling
    Chen, Yu
    Liu, Tingting
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 111
  • [32] Advancing quantification methods of sustainability: A critical examination emergy, exergy, ecological footprint, and ecological information-based approaches
    Kharrazi, Ali
    Kraines, Steven
    Hoang, Lan
    Yarime, Masaru
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 : 81 - 89
  • [33] Ecological Footprint as a tool for local sustainability: The municipality of Piacenza (Italy) as a case study
    Scotti, Marco
    Bondavalli, Cristina
    Bodini, Antonio
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [34] Sustainability evolution and factors based on ecological footprint: A case study of Rizhao, China
    Sun, Wei
    Li, Junli
    Qu, Wenxi
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2022, 53 (01) : 132 - 150
  • [35] Ecological Footprint as a sustainability indicator to analyze energy consumption in a Portuguese textile facility
    I. Costa
    F. G. Martins
    I. Alves
    International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2019, 10 : 523 - 528
  • [36] Ecological Footprint as a sustainability indicator to analyze energy consumption in a Portuguese textile facility
    Costa, I.
    Martins, F. G.
    Alves, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 10 (04) : 523 - 528
  • [37] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Rafique, Muhammad Zahid
    Nadeem, Abdul Majeed
    Xia, Wanjun
    Ikram, Majid
    Shoaib, Hafiz Muhammad
    Shahzad, Umer
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (04) : 4623 - 4640
  • [38] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Muhammad Zahid Rafique
    Abdul Majeed Nadeem
    Wanjun Xia
    Majid Ikram
    Hafiz Muhammad Shoaib
    Umer Shahzad
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 4623 - 4640
  • [39] Emergy Footprint Analysis of Gannan Tibet an Autonomous Prefecture Ecological Economic Systems
    Liu, Hua
    Wei, Yu-mei
    Jin, Xin
    ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 254 : 53 - 61
  • [40] Emergy ecological footprint analysis of Yaghooti grape production in the Sistan region of Iran
    Enayat, Fatemeh Fartout
    Ghanbari, Seyed Ahmad
    Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza
    Seyedabadi, Esmaeel
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2023, 481