Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices

被引:7
|
作者
Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak [1 ,2 ]
Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn [1 ,2 ]
Kongsomboon, Kittipong [4 ]
Chantra, Somporn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rajavithi Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Rangsit Med Coll, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Priest Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Fac Med, Dept Prevent & Social Med, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; PERIPHERAL IRIDOTOMY; GLAUCOMA; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0265844
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate agreement between 2 swept source OCT biometers, IOL Master700 and Anterion, in various ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculations of primary angle-closure disease (PACD). SettingRajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. DesignProspective comparative study. MethodsThis study conducted in a tertiary eye care center involving biometric measurements obtained with 2 devices in phakic eye with diagnosis of PACD. Mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with confidence limits were assessed, and calculations of estimated residual refraction of the IOL were analysed using Barrett's formula. ResultsSixty-nine eyes from 45 PACD patients were enrolled for the study. Excellent agreement of various parameters was revealed, with ICC (confidence limits) of K1 = 0.953 (0.861-0.979), K2 = 0.950 (0.778-0.98), ACD = 0.932 (0.529-0.978), WTW = 0.775 (0.477-0.888), and LT = 0.947 (0.905-0.97). Mean difference of axial length (AL) was -0.01 +/- 0.02 mm with ICC of 1.000. IOL calculation was assessed with Barrett's formula, and Bland-Altman plot showed excellent agreement in the results of the 2 devices for the IOL power and estimated post-operative residual refraction (EPR). ConclusionsMean differences of biometric parameters, obtained with IOL Master700 and Anterion, were small, and ICC showed excellent concordance. No clinical relevance in calculation of IOL power was found, and the two devices appeared to be comparably effective in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Imaging the Iris with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography: Relationship between Iris Volume and Primary Angle Closure
    Mak, Heather
    Xu, Guihua
    Leung, Christopher Kai-Shun
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (12) : 2517 - 2524
  • [32] Increased choroidal thickness in primary angle closure measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography in Caucasian population
    Diem-Trang Nguyen
    Audrey Giocanti-Aurégan
    Nassima Benhatchi
    Nicolas Greliche
    Helene Beaussier
    Pierre Sustronck
    Sirine Hammoud
    Marie-Nathalie Jeanteur
    Gilles Kretz
    Olivia Abitbol
    Yves Lachkar
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 195 - 203
  • [33] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Anterior Chamber Angle Measurement with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Primary Angle Closure Suspect
    Zhao, Tong
    Zhao, Mengya
    Xie, Qinghong
    Fong, Christopher W.
    Chen, Jeremy
    Liu, Yingna
    Feng, Hui
    Li, Shuning
    Arnold, Benjamin F.
    Aung, Tin
    He, Mingguang
    Oatts, Julius T.
    Han, Ying
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2021, 46 (12) : 1853 - 1860
  • [34] Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
    Boonsong Wanichwecharungruang
    Anyarak Amornpetchsathaporn
    Kittipong Kongsomboon
    Wisakorn Wongwijitsook
    Kornkamol Annopawong
    Somporn Chantra
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [35] Evaluation of Ocular Diameter Parameters Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Dong, Jing
    Yao, Jinhan
    Chang, Shuimiao
    Kanclerz, Piotr
    Khoramnia, Ramin
    Wang, Xiaogang
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (05):
  • [36] Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
    Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong
    Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak
    Kongsomboon, Kittipong
    Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn
    Annopawong, Kornkamol
    Chantra, Somporn
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [37] Diagnostic performance of swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in classifying primary angle closure disease
    Liu, Yingna
    Wu, Yanyan
    Ma, Ping
    Wu, Jian
    Saifee, Murtaza
    Arnold, Benjamin
    Chen, Junyi
    He, Mingguang
    Yang, Yangfan
    Han, Ying
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [38] Subgrouping of Primary Angle-Closure Suspects Based on Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters
    Nongpiur, Monisha E.
    Gong, Tianxia
    Lee, Hwee Kuan
    Perera, Shamira A.
    Cheng, Li
    Foo, Li-Lian
    He, Mingguang
    Friedman, David S.
    Aung, Tin
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (12) : 2525 - 2531
  • [39] Detecting macular disease with a biometry device using swept-source optical coherence tomography Reply
    Hirnschall, Nino
    Leisser, Christoph
    Radda, Stephan
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (10): : 1545 - 1545
  • [40] Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices and Scheimpflug tomography in patients with cataract
    Ma, Shan
    Li, Cheng
    Sun, Jing
    Yang, Jun
    Wen, Kai
    Chen, Xi-Teng
    Zhao, Fang-Yu
    Gao, Rong-Yu
    Tian, Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 17 (08) : 1437 - 1446