Internal embeddedness of business group affiliates and innovation performance: Evidence from China

被引:6
|
作者
Zheng, Li [1 ]
Ma, Pengcheng [2 ]
Hong, Jacky Fok Loi [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, 308 Ningxia Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Management, Bldg 26, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Business Adm, Ave Univ, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
Business groups; Directorate embeddedness; Capital embeddedness; Innovation performance; Internal embeddedness; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; FAMILY BUSINESS; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; PYRAMIDAL OWNERSHIP; PARTY TRANSACTIONS; DUAL EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPITAL-MARKETS; IMPACT; MNC;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102494
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Existing research on the relationship between internal embeddedness and the innovation performance of business group affiliates reports mixed results. We adopt embeddedness theory to identify two distinct characteristics of internal embeddedness, namely directorate embeddedness and capital embeddedness, and their respective impacts on business group affiliates' innovation performance. Based on a sample of listed affiliates in China from 2009 to 2018, our empirical results show that directorate embeddedness is positively related to the innovation performance of affiliates, whereas capital embeddedness has an inverted U-shaped effect. Furthermore, the pyramidal control layers of business groups attenuate the positive relationship between directorate embeddedness and the innovation performance of affiliates, and similar pyramidal control layers abate the inverted Ushaped relationship between capital embeddedness and innovation performance. Our findings highlight the distinctive characteristics of internal embeddedness and provide new insights into an organizational structure that drives business group affiliates' innovation performance in a key emerging market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ownership identity, strategy and performance: Business group affiliates versus independent firms in India
    Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar
    Estrin, Saul
    Mickiewicz, Tomasz
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 34 (02) : 281 - 311
  • [42] INTERNAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF OVERSEAS R&D BASE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
    Yoneyama, Shigemi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 (06)
  • [43] Open innovation and innovative performance of universities: Evidence from China
    Ye, Lei
    Zeng, Gang
    Cao, Xianzhong
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (03) : 1142 - 1157
  • [44] Institutional Pressure, Environmental Innovation and Performance: Evidence from China
    Li, Yina
    Zhao, Xiande
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (ICOSCM 2010), 2010, 4 : 843 - 847
  • [45] ESG performance and corporate technology innovation: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiangyang
    Li, Zijun
    Qiu, Zhaoxuan
    Wang, Jinmin
    Liu, Bei
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 206
  • [46] Performance Surplus Inconsistency and Firm Innovation: Evidence From China
    Gong, Min
    Wang, Wei
    Jiang, Xu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2025, 72 : 512 - 526
  • [47] How do group affiliates benefit from dual legitimacy to acquire resources in emerging economies? Evidence from China
    Zheng, Xiaoyong
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 15 (03) : 688 - 724
  • [48] Business strategy aggressiveness and firm innovation: evidence from listed companies in China
    Zhang, Wenzong
    Jiang, Xu
    Wen, Mingzhen
    Su, Xiaomei
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [49] Ownership identity, strategy and performance: Business group affiliates versus independent firms in India
    Sumon Kumar Bhaumik
    Saul Estrin
    Tomasz Mickiewicz
    Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2017, 34 : 281 - 311
  • [50] Embeddedness and local patterns of innovation: evidence from Chinese prefectural cities
    Prodi, Giorgio
    Nicolli, Francesco
    Frattini, Federico
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2020, 30 (04) : 1219 - 1242