Internal embeddedness of business group affiliates and innovation performance: Evidence from China

被引:6
|
作者
Zheng, Li [1 ]
Ma, Pengcheng [2 ]
Hong, Jacky Fok Loi [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, 308 Ningxia Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Management, Bldg 26, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Business Adm, Ave Univ, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
Business groups; Directorate embeddedness; Capital embeddedness; Innovation performance; Internal embeddedness; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; FAMILY BUSINESS; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; PYRAMIDAL OWNERSHIP; PARTY TRANSACTIONS; DUAL EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPITAL-MARKETS; IMPACT; MNC;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102494
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Existing research on the relationship between internal embeddedness and the innovation performance of business group affiliates reports mixed results. We adopt embeddedness theory to identify two distinct characteristics of internal embeddedness, namely directorate embeddedness and capital embeddedness, and their respective impacts on business group affiliates' innovation performance. Based on a sample of listed affiliates in China from 2009 to 2018, our empirical results show that directorate embeddedness is positively related to the innovation performance of affiliates, whereas capital embeddedness has an inverted U-shaped effect. Furthermore, the pyramidal control layers of business groups attenuate the positive relationship between directorate embeddedness and the innovation performance of affiliates, and similar pyramidal control layers abate the inverted Ushaped relationship between capital embeddedness and innovation performance. Our findings highlight the distinctive characteristics of internal embeddedness and provide new insights into an organizational structure that drives business group affiliates' innovation performance in a key emerging market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rule of Law Enhancement, Innovation Incentives, and Business Performance: Evidence from China's IPCs
    Hao, Wang
    Chengkui, Liu
    Yue, Yu
    Xiaodan, Lin
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [22] Local business environment and firm innovation: evidence from China
    Wu, Jiapeng
    Gao, Dayu
    Xu, Cheng
    Sun, Yanqi
    KYBERNETES, 2024,
  • [23] Study on relationship between network embeddedness and innovation performance in China
    Zhang Fanghua
    Tao Jingyuan
    Zuo Tianyuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 SUZHOU-SILICON VALLEY-BEIJING INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION CONFERENCE (SIIC): TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND DIASPORAS IN A GLOBAL ERA, 2013, : 241 - 248
  • [24] Subsidiary innovation performance: Balancing external knowledge sources and internal embeddedness
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Bogers, Marcel L. A. M.
    Bresciani, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (04)
  • [25] Technological innovation and environmental performance: evidence from China
    Wu, Yuying
    Zhang, Min
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2024, 124 (05) : 1746 - 1768
  • [26] Innovation of listed firms and new business formation: evidence from China
    Wu, Shuping
    Wang, Changyan
    Yang, Zan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [27] Business environment optimization and corporate sustainable innovation: Evidence from China
    Liang, Zhanyong
    Qiu, Kangquan
    Zhuang, Jiakun
    Zhang, Qingyang
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 71
  • [28] Business group and analyst earnings forecast: evidence from China
    Han, Jie
    Liu, Chang
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024, 31 (04) : 560 - 585
  • [29] Do internationalizing business group affiliates perform better after promarket reforms? Evidence from Korean SMEs
    Shin, Joonho
    Mendoza, Xavier
    Choi, Changbum
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2022, 39 (02) : 805 - 841
  • [30] Technology embeddedness, innovation differentiation strategies and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms
    Liu, Xuefeng
    Wu, Xiaobo
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 13 (01): : 20 - 35