Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Column after Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty: A Finite Element Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Baoshan [3 ]
Liu, Yancheng [2 ]
Zhang, Jingyu [2 ]
Xu, Guijun [2 ]
Shao, Pengfei [5 ]
Li, Xiaoye [4 ]
Hu, Yongcheng [2 ]
Ma, Xinlong [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Coll Orthopaed, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Tianjin Hosp, Dept Bone & Tissue Oncol, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Tianjin Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Spine Surg, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Third Cent Hosp Tianjin, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[5] Shijingshan Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomechanical; Bone cement; Finite element analysis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Percutaneous cement discoplasty; PMMA; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; CAGES; IMPLANTATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/os.13314
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) in the spinal column between different implant-endplate friction. Methods A validated L3-Scarumfinite element (FE) model was modified for simulation. In the PCD model, the L4/5 level was modified based on model 1 (M1) and model 2 (M2). In M1, the interaction between bone cement and endplate was defined as face-to-face contact with a friction coefficient of 0.3; in M2, the contact was defined as a Tie constraint. 7.5 N m moments of four physiological motions and axial load of 15, 100 and 400 N preload were imposed at the top of L3. The range of motion (ROM) and interface stress analysis of endplates, annulus fibrosus and bone cement of the operated level were calculated for comparisons among the three models. Results The ROM of M1 and M2 increased when compared with the intact model during flexion (FL) (17.5% vs 10.0%), extension (EX) (8.8% vs -8.8%), left bending (LB) (19.0% vs -17.2%) and left axial rotation (LR) (34.6% vs -3.8%). The stress of annulus fibrosus in M1 and M2 decreased in FL (-48.4% vs -57.5%), EX (-25.7% vs -14.7%), LB (-47.5% vs -52.4%), LR (-61.4% vs -68.7%) and axis loading of 100 N (-41.5% vs -15.3%), and 400 N (-27.9% vs -27.3%). The stress of upper endplate of M1 and M2 increased in FL (24.6% vs 24.7%), LB (82.2% vs 89.5%), LR (119% vs 62.4%) and axis loading of 100 N (64.6% vs 45.5%), and 400 N (58.2% vs 24.3%), but was similar in EX (2.9% vs 0.3%). The stress of lower endplate of M1 and M2 increased in FL (170.9% vs 175.0%), EX (180.8% vs 207.7%), LB (302.6% vs 274.7%), LR (332.4% vs 132.8%) and axis loading of 100 N (350.7% vs 168.6%), and 400 N (165.2% vs 106.7%). Conclusion Percutaneous cement discoplasty procedure could make effect on the mobility or stiffness. The fusion of bone cement and endplate might have more biomechanical advantages, including of the decreasing rate of implant subsidence and dislocation, and the increase spine stability.
引用
收藏
页码:1853 / 1863
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical modeling of spinal ligaments: finite element analysis of L4-L5 spinal segment
    Hamidrad, Shabnam
    Abdollahi, Masoud
    Badali, Vahid
    Nikkhoo, Mohammad
    Naserkhaki, Sadegh
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (16) : 1807 - 1818
  • [42] Biomechanical Evaluation of Clival Screw Fixation for Occipitocervical Instablity: A Finite Element Analysis
    Lin, Weipeng
    Zheng, Jianying
    Zhang, Meichao
    Xu, Panjie
    Xiao, Hang
    Ji, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 17 (02) : 583 - 592
  • [43] Biomechanical evaluation of subaxial lateral mass prothesis: a finite element analysis study
    Jian, Qiang
    Liu, Zhenlei
    Duan, Wanru
    Jian, Fengzeng
    Bo, Xuefeng
    Chen, Zan
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 25 (16) : 1870 - 1878
  • [44] BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF ENDODONTIC POST-RESTORED TEETH - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Su, Kuo-Chih
    Chang, Chih-Han
    Chuang, Shu-Fen
    Ng, E. Y. K.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 13 (01)
  • [45] Biomechanical evaluation of implant options for unilateral maxillary defects: a finite element analysis
    Acar, Gulin
    Ari, Ilgin
    Tosun, Emre
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [46] Segmentation and Meshing for Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis
    Hall, A. S.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 59 : E92 - E92
  • [47] Biomechanical study of spinal cord and nerve root in idiopathic scoliosis: based on finite element analysis
    Ma, Jibin
    Wang, Jian
    Yang, Yuming
    Wu, Jincheng
    Liu, Ziwen
    Miao, Jun
    Yan, Xu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [48] OF TRACTION LOAD ON THE BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF CERVICAL, THORACIC, AND LUMBAR SPINAL SEGMENTS - A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Hussain, Mozammil
    Tepe, Rodger
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2008, PTS A AND B, 2009, : 719 - 720
  • [49] Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
    Ha, Seung-Ryong
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 7 (06): : 475 - 483
  • [50] Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement thickness
    Ha, Seung-Ryong
    Kim, Sung-Hun
    Lee, Jai-Bong
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Yeo, In-Sung
    Yoo, Seung-Hyun
    Kim, Hee-Kyung
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 42 (13) : 14928 - 14936