Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

被引:1
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [2 ]
Myland, Melissa [2 ]
Nixon, Mark [2 ]
Gooch, Nick [3 ]
Shaunik, Alka [4 ]
Lew, Elisheva [5 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Diabet Ctr, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] IQVIA, London, England
[3] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[5] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
adherence; electronic medical records; glycaemic control; oral antidiabetic drugs; real-world study; treatment intensification; type 2 diabetes melitus; CLINICAL INERTIA; ADHERENCE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERSISTENCE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION; INSULIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/edm2.94
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real-world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods: Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (>58 mmol/mol [>7.5%] or >64 mmol/mol [>8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12 months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12 months post-index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results: A total of 10 832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6 months was -1.13% (intensifiers) vs -0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12 months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6 months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.86]), which was similar at 12 months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions: Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6 months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12 months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment preference in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs -: a cross-sectional non-interventional survey
    Stridde, E
    Clemens, A
    Pfützner, A
    Forst, T
    Huppertz, E
    von Torne, I
    Petrak, F
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A303 - A303
  • [32] SPIRIT: Assessing Clinical Parameters Associated with Using IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting in Colombia
    Ramirez-Rincon, Alex
    Henao-Carrillo, Diana
    Omeara, Miguel
    Oliveros, Julio
    Assaf, Jose
    Ordonez, Jaime E.
    Prasad, Preethy
    Alzate, Maria Alejandra
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2024, 15 (07) : 1535 - 1545
  • [33] Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Clinical Response to Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Poor Glycaemic Control: 2-Year-Follow-up in Real-World Setting
    Lecumberri, Edurne
    Ortega, Maite
    Lopez-Mezquita, Elena
    Orozco-Beltran, Domingo
    Vazquez, Clotilde
    DIABETES, 2016, 65 : A570 - A570
  • [34] Metabolic Control and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Using IDegLira in a Real-World Setting
    Cheli Melzer-Cohen
    Gabriel Chodick
    Shiran Naftelberg
    Naim Shehadeh
    Avraham Karasik
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 185 - 196
  • [35] Metabolic Control and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Using IDegLira in a Real-World Setting
    Melzer-Cohen, Cheli
    Chodick, Gabriel
    Naftelberg, Shiran
    Shehadeh, Naim
    Karasik, Avraham
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (01) : 185 - 196
  • [36] A Real-World Observational Study of Time to Treatment Intensification Among Elderly Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Ajmera, Mayank
    Raval, Amit
    Zhou, Steve
    Wei, Wenhui
    Bhattacharya, Rituparna
    Pan, Chunshen
    Sambamoorthi, Usha
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (12): : 1184 - +
  • [37] Assessing glycaemic impact of FreeStyle libre monitoring in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a retrospective real-world analysis
    Atkinson, Michael
    Williams, David M.
    Crockett, Elin
    Hathaway, Isaac
    Mon, May
    Stephens, Jeffrey W.
    Min, Thinzar
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2025, 24 (01)
  • [38] EVALUATING SHORT-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LIRAGLUTIDE VERSUS ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN A CHINESE SETTING
    Shi, L. W.
    Han, S.
    Sun, F.
    Liu, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A163 - A163
  • [39] Clinical Experience with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: The Turkish PRESENT Study
    Guler, Serdar
    Tuna, Siebnem
    Bech, Ole
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2008, 12 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [40] COMPARATIVE ASSSESMENT OF ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUG-MEDIATED GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT REAL-WORLD DATABASES
    Kanegasaki, A.
    Iwasaki, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S369 - S369